Mouse-pig and super-fish seek approval for human consumption...Yummy!

reply to post by reticlevision


I never mentioned your sentence structure, I just want
better proof than...'just because'

i just kill and eat anything in my backyard.

or anything unlucky enough to get caught. like that homeless family.

ate a skunk once. no twice, not bad if you kill em before they spray and remove the glands.

Originally posted by Klassified
reply to post by reticlevision

 

Nobody cares if you have an opposing opinion to this thread. That's part of what this site is about.

But trolling and personal attacks are another matter. And that is exactly what you are doing.

Oh. I'm s0orry
?i wasn;t aware tthat i was contributing to the thread in an an unwarranted manner
I'll suffice to eat my WELL documented mouse -pig that hasn;t been released for my consumption with bated fork and breath

reply to post by Nosred

Well, thats twice tonight. First Jean Paul, and now you. You guys are gonna have my gut hurting.

reply to post by fooks


It would probably be healthier than eating 'grocery chain' bought.

Go buy your produce from "un-genetically" modified sources
Plant your garden from " pure_seed" sources
nlet me know how you did it
my bad
And let me know
Poor sentence structure belies intelligence

reply to post by Klassified


Well right there is yet another reason for me to stop eating pork. *gag*

*gag again*

I need to go back to being a vegetarian... but apparently I'll have to grow my own food to make sure it has been tampered with.

reply to post by gemineye

I think we're gonna have to find a way into Bill Gates seed vault. You can bet those seeds are unmodified.

Anyone with pictures of this alleged creatures?

reply to post by decadence


The animals..while alive, look like they should...maybe more lethargic and less alert, but look similar...indistinguishable maybe..as to render any pictures useless and inconclusive. But all I ask is HAVE YOU PURCHASED THEM BOTH, AND PAYED ATTENTION TO THE CONSISTENCY, SMELL, COLOR. There, sadly is a difference. And truly independent, unbiased studies have shown a marked lack of nutrition in comparison to 'un-tampered' with fruits and vegetables of a couple of decades ago. If your openminded, or really offer more than the defensive retort. Please I urge you to watch "Food Inc". then come back and reply. What makes you think that the bottom line doesn't influence the moral compass of any large company? Please, please do some more research..for..and against...Believe me, I want to believe it's all safe, but the evidence swings to a stronger 'no'

Originally posted by arrus75
reply to post by Klassified

 

This just makes me sick (as a Canadian) the GMO crops seem to be polluting the surrounding crops with it's pollen, and now may have a weird micro virus thing that causes premature births in animals! (there was an ATS thread about it)

I shudder to think that I may be eating a 'tinkered' animal and the unknown effects...as I understand it, activating one gene for one thing and deactivating a gene for another can have repercussions in other biological aspects of the animal. Pretty soon we're going to have an 'ingredients' list in our so called 100% meats (95%Beef, 2% scorpion, 1%pig, 3%broccoli).....but then again, we'll just never know either way...

edit on 25-2-2011 by arrus75 because: typo

It seems that Monsanto is unstoppable doesn't it??? Good 'ole Monsanto. There when the world really needs them. And the seeds are soooooo cheap too.

I bethca Monsanto seeds will grow on the moon.... They should relocate their factory there and all their employees too.

Originally posted by reticlevision
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux

 

Horrifying-Schmorrifying
Mankind wouldbn't be alive today if not for "genetically-modified" food
Go find a glass of milk that doesn't contain growth-hormone
Go pick an apple off a tree that wasn't "selectively-bred"
Go to Burpee's seed catalog n find a strain of cucumber that is pure and "non_adulterated" by mankind

You seem to be unclear on the concept.

Growth hormone in milk is NOT GMO.

Hybridization is NOT GMO.

What adulteration are you speaking of in re cucumbers? Unless it's seed that has been blasted with genetic material, altering thereby its original genetics, it's NOT GMO, either.

We're talking changing the DNA, not messing around with the systems of live animals (growth hormone), combining strains each with original genetics to add to the mix (hybridization), or any other efforts that do not alter DNA.

It is the alteration of the DNA that leads to "foods" that are less nutritious, that create issues in the consuming individual, and degrade the purity of the genetic code.

EDIT to add: We have plenty of food - natural and GMO-free on this planet. It is the distribution based on profit and not need that is the issue. Grocery stores throw out hundreds of thousands of tons of food each month. FYI.