It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CIGGSofWAR
Mulit-Reality butterfly bounce balance It's allot bigger and more involved than you ever thought it was.
Science is observation and indication, but it is also responsible determination, with observation and indication tempered by established fact and/or overwhelming empirical data and hard logical reasoning. There's plenty to get excited over without falling prey to magical thinking.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by NorEaster
now that was an interesting and informative post all the way up to this ...
Science is observation and indication, but it is also responsible determination, with observation and indication tempered by established fact and/or overwhelming empirical data and hard logical reasoning. There's plenty to get excited over without falling prey to magical thinking.
would you be touting the same science principle that encouraged humans to believe the Earth was flat for centuries? or perhaps the Sun orbited Earth or that Galileo was perceived a heretic? or maybe the same science that based the foundation of physics on 'standards' that are changing rapidly everyday, but were once believed to be 'static'?
i almost starred your post until the 'dimensional delusions' you've been trained to accept and promote made their vile appearance. With such voluntary restrictions, growth is hampered and understanding is but a word.
yes, i believe science has its place ... as a working theory, nothing more. if any scientist can show a constant, static, foundational baseline, i may be more inclined to agree ... however, as most are well aware, even the foundational baseline is changing every day because our world is dynamic, not static.
Life is not static, why would you deny the most dynamic influence of all ... that which many perceive as, majik?
It’s pretty easy to just state that God (or energy, for that matter) exists, has always existed, and will always exist. In fact, it’s extremely easy to make that statement. It’s even easier if you follow it up with the claim that human beings can't know the truth about the eternal nature of God (or energy), and are foolish to even approach the subject. Or better yet, you can declare that these pesky humans are defiant of God’s authority when they approach this subject, and that it is a mystery that no human can ever know. This approach wraps it all up very nicely.
However, if we take a good look at what else has been stated about any one of these eternal gods, we begin to see some real problems with the dichotomy of an eternal god who has a specific timetable for humanity, and who actually adjusts His approach and attitude toward humanity as causal time moves forward within the relationship between the two. Let me explain.
In the larger presentation of an eternal god, we have a spectacularly brilliant, conscious being that has existed for all time. In fact, time doesn't even exist in the realm of this being. He experiences a forever now, with all that was, all that is, and all that ever will be, in physical existence as a permanent now. Not only does He experience this, He experiences it as an all-knowing, and all-experiencing hyper-awareness that is expressed as dynamic and unique personage. This suggests that what began for humanity, what is for humanity, and what will be for humanity, always is for God. This, logically speaking, suggests two completely incompatible existential states of being that can never be reconciled. Or so it would seem.
In fact, there is one issue that presents itself immediately when conceiving of this relationship between that which is, and that which becomes as time progresses. In His physical involvement with humanity, which now (as in a human time-centric now, since corporeal humanity is an ongoing result of tightly bound causal progression and interaction) would this god deal with? If this god selected a now for physical interaction, how would this god separate that specific slice of now out from the entire equal and logically inseparable now that would always be present in that eternal god’s perception of the human being’s ongoing trajectory and then resulting continuum? How would this god even perceive (let alone, respond to) this trajectory/continuum structure if causation is impossible in its realm?
Or is it a case where this god can become equally trajectory/continuum-centric (as a complete and foundational basis of what He is) at will, but if so, how does He establish His own individual historical context (back-dating Himself, as it were) in order to form His own unique projected trajectory, before fitting His own inimitable contextual identity into the contextual whole of each previously established continuum within the contextual environment as is the case with all else that’s collected within that environment – having established that environment as an environment to begin with?
Or is it a case of God being able to do whatever the hell He wants to, and just doing it in spite of all that’s come into being within this tightly woven causal environment that contains us and everything we know to exist? But then, if that’s the case, then why do religions each have their god focused on critical mission-centric dramas designed to engage humans in activities that are meant to satisfy a very specific need that only humanity can fulfill for the god of said religion? Or am I in danger of losing my eternal existence by even bothering to puzzle any of this out?
(excerpt from TAKING DOWN THE CURTAIN)
decades of serious and careful research.
We know a lot more about reality than they did even 500 years ago
just doing it in spite of all that’s come into being within this tightly woven causal environment that contains us and everything we know to exist?
then why do religions each have their god focused on critical mission-centric dramas designed to engage humans in activities that are meant to satisfy a very specific need that only humanity can fulfill for the god of said religion?
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by NorEaster
oh come on now, we've identified 12,000yrs of human life form on this planet and you think the 'Flat' concept just appeared outta thin air? are u serious?
what does it matter if Galileo was first or not? where did that distinction come from?
suppose i should advise you that my historical knowledge far surpasses the Dark Ages, perhaps you should catch up to the rest of us? however, there isn't a whole lot of reference to the science of those days because the Dark Ages destroyed it. (or didn't they teach you that part?)
decades of serious and careful research.
you mean like the decades of Al Gore and that kinda serious and careful research ? or maybe the kind of hasty research done on experimental drugs so they can be 'tried' on the public only to be attorney fodder at a later date? or maybe the kinda research that says Astrology has gained another Sun sign? or, how 'bout the science of psychology that practices on our most vulnerable ... children?? yeppers, i'm all too familiar with the 'science' protocols and practices.
We know a lot more about reality than they did even 500 years ago
now there's a quantum leap considering we, to this day, cannot decipher, interpret or even explain the science of the Mayan culture. do you realize that even with ALL of the sciences of today, we cannot replicate any of the pyramids with comparable mathematical precision? i'm guessing records of 500 or more yrs ago still have much to teach. Dead Sea Scrolls ring a bell?
ahem, i never suggested any such alignment ... nice deflection though.
fluid time and a time/space continuum is much more than a notion ... it just has yet to be fully discovered.
well, after briefing your excerpt, i must suggest ... after many out-of-body experiences, your author has much to learn. if you actually believe that tripe, please explain deja-vu or do you simply deny it?
besides, if one views god as energy, then we are but an extension of him/it.
why is god perceived to be 'external' ?? the concept of omniscience rather eliminates that possibility.
please define 'image', then we'll talk.
just doing it in spite of all that’s come into being within this tightly woven causal environment that contains us and everything we know to exist?
causal environment? says who? science i would suppose even though they are still learning.
if we know everything to exist, why are their new discoveries, daily, annually, geographically, inter-personally, spiritually, emotionally, physically and universally? clearly, we all have much to learn.
then why do religions each have their god focused on critical mission-centric dramas designed to engage humans in activities that are meant to satisfy a very specific need that only humanity can fulfill for the god of said religion?
because religions are created and led by humans. spirituality transcends any need for religion.
how exactly did a ripple effect thread transform into this mish-mash about a time continuum anyway?
the ripple-effect can be demonstrated in any number of physical examples. why is it so hard to accept in a quantum or spiritual realm? can you logically explain a physical, ripple effect? (careful, tsunami warnings aren't perfected yet) so, why is any logical explanation necessary for majik?
exactly, i agree --> what does it matter ??
what does it matter if Galileo was first or not?
they you go on to say
"Science is observation and indication, but it is also responsible determination, with observation and indication tempered by established fact and/or overwhelming empirical data and hard logical reasoning. There's plenty to get excited over without falling prey to magical thinking.
Who gives a sh*t where it originated. It wasn't based on logic or evidence.
why would i bother Junior ???
Are you try to troll me? Not a good idea there, skippy.
what?? are you drunk or on quaaludes? sorry for your fantasy but Sarah simply doesn't float my boat. the rest of this rant isn't deserving a response.
So, now you're a Sarah Palin miracle thinker?
------ well of course not, a closed-mind is seldom introduced or exposed to such extraordinary and exciting experiences. flame?? oohhhhh, you can't handle the truth ... i get it.
fluid time and a time/space continuum is much more than a notion ... it just has yet to be fully discovered. please explain deja-vu or do you simply deny it?
besides, if one views god as energy, then we are but an extension of him/it.
why is god perceived to be 'external' ?? the concept of omniscience rather eliminates that possibility.
please define 'image', then we'll talk.
I have no idea what this little flame-out was all about.
that excerpt explains nothing, it is an opinion, nothing more.
That excerpt explains why a non-causal being can't engage directly with a causal being. I wrote that exceprt myself and I never had an out-of-body experience, so I have no idea what you're trying to suggest. I suspect that you have no idea either.
this is the most perverted reasoning for cause/effect i've ever heard. the mere 'existence' of an event indicates no direct cause but may reveal some effect. Without further investigation, the relation of cause/effect is both suggestive and premature based on assumption laced with minimal fact.
If an event occurs, then the fact of that event comes into existence as soon as it occurs. That is the most fundamental example of cause/effect.
If what you state above is your 'perception of reality', it is not my desire to share in your limitations and please, try showing some respect to others ... instead of wrongly insisting my reality isn't possible.
This is the basis of reality. At least have the dignity to not treat it like a kid on a swing you want to hijack for yourself.
Man.....I'm done with this exchange. The ripple effect is about time-continuum and the ramification of event. If you can't even see that, then this is a waste. I'll hit reply, but only as a protest against belligerent ignorance and the jerks who try to bully people with it.
try taking your own advice
Try a laxative.