"1 in 4 planets Earth-like" Science, Geoff Marcy, planet finder

Disclosure is so close, in relative terms. Kepler, Gliese, and now Science
magazine has an article including planet finder Geoffrey Marcy saying that 1 in
4 stars has Earth-like planets. www.dailymail.co.uk...

That would be ovver 10 billion in the Milky Way, alone!

So, pressure is on. Eyes are opening, and the real story can't be hidden much
longer. Within a matter of months, or years, we almost certainly will hear about
nearby, living planets.

Just remember, when disclosure occurs, it's a once-in-history moment. Cabal
monsters will try to sweep everything under the rug, black budget mafioso who
did dirty deals with abducting aliens will try to say we're already trading
parterns with them, so why worry?

Will you be ready with adequate, good-source information to pose for readers
when the stories break? Don't just be a spectator; be an activist!

I have read several stories in alluding to this figure that was released recently. I can't help but wonder personally if this isn't more of the idea behind the "100 year spaceship plan" If we can get a space ship up to relativistic speeds than it should be possible to make it to one of these habitable planets in the lifetimes of the passangers on board.

1 in 4 stars May have earth like planets, not 1 in 4 planets earth like. . .

That is...very optimistic.

Who knows, it could be correct. If it is, we might not be as alone as once thought.

Space and science is copyrighted by the intelligence services.
They let out the most foolish of talk to bolster their agenda.

occupation: planet finder .

Originally posted by neonitus
occupation: planet finder .

Perhaps Obama can assign more jobs like that which seems so important.
I'm sure he couldn't fire any.
Protected by CIA.

reply to post by TeslaandLyne


Your lame responses certainly don't help the optimism in this thread.

Seriously, either find something positive to say or go troll elsewhere.

Me? I kind of think that there are other habitable planets out there.

The truth is, many many many people have absolutely no understanding of just how totally earth shattering this all is. it was only 30 years ago that the perceived wisdom and the model adhered to by virtually all astronomers was one that postulated the following. Planets were actually quite rare because the majority of star systems are actually binaries or even larger. The practical upshot of this being that, the gravity fields caused by these systems would make planetary formation unlikely.

Here's a few things Astronomers were almost sure of 30 years ago

There was not even the faintest possibility of water on the Moon

The only other planet in the solar system that could possibly have even the most basic sort of life on it, was Mars.

Stars could not possibly be above a certain mass greater than our Sun 150 x time the mass of the Sun

Planets are almost certainly quite a rarity and most definitely not the norm around other stars..

The Rolling Stones will not make another worthwhile album during their career.

At least they were right on one in five....

I see no great shakes in responses here.
This type of hearsay is irresponsible at best for any information agency.
Its basic propaganda and tantamount to the Big Lie that let Von Braun
and Disney go to the Moon.
ED: Do they even know where these rocks come from.
Stars end fission at iron, that might do for Mars.
If its an all iron planet.
How do they see star movement by planets when I wonder
if they can determine the same about the Sun.
They can't even find landers on the moon without controversy.
Space corporation of America is in charge of all
associated fantasies.
Have they even told us of radiation levels around the
Earth or in space. Don't think so cause the last time
I heard someone would find out I saw no answer.
Do we actually expect data from the corp.

Originally posted by TheOneElectric
That is...very optimistic.

Who knows, it could be correct. If it is, we might not be as alone as once thought.

Interesting that you would say that we once thought we were alone when, in fact, there are many historical references stating we have never been alone.

Cheers!

At the end of the day, regardless of the fame and reputation of the quoted source, it is still just speculation.

I also believe the galaxy is teeming with an abundance of life in many different forms and plenty of worlds, but "show me the money" as the old saying goes.

Anyone can speculate.

Cheers!

I always though the western landscape of red rocks looked like it
came from Mars.
Other than Velikovsky I doubt anyone would think a chunk of Mars
came down on Earth.
Given that some Earth planet sized rocks might be generated somehow
the process might be the old proto planet theory of being ejected from
a larger planet. This perhaps age old theory was accepted seemingly
until Velikovsky said Venus was observed by the ancients, hence where
future mankind received its knowledge, to have been ejected by Jupiter.
Of all things exactly the proto plant theory.
With all the wild and crazy rocks traveling around the early solar system
development of Velikovsky seem quite the norm but not mentioned at
just the possibility of nicely revolving planets. Massive Suns coupling
was said to be noted at one time to be sensed as moving.
Going to rock planets seems an advance in technology not fully
explained.