9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts speak out.

reply to post by Doctor Smith


These videos were a great find, NIST did their report in a way so they could ignore demolition and explosions.
NIST never discussed what really caused the initial onset collapse of the WTC. Had they, it would have opened the door into doing a hypothesis to controlled demolition. NIST was clearly being deceptive just in that part of their report, as Kevin Ryan points out.

reply to post by Doctor Smith

NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!

www.youtube.com...

Your second video is really good and not one single OS defender can give us any answers to refute the answers and question to this video. It certainly appears even science can be bought.

reply to post by Doctor Smith

Another excellent video Debunking NIST.

Why the NIST report on WTC7 is unscientific and false

This is an excellent video thanks. Did you see the pent house in the video on WTC 7, un-flipping believable! Yet the OS defenders want you and I to believe it just fell all by it’s self. I can clearly see the evidence of demolition; one would have to be completely blind to not see it.

Some irrefutable key points that the deniers can NEVER explain away or account for:

- Thermite residue and iron microspheres have been found in the WTC dust. This is HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE of artificial explosives and chemicals used.

- There is no way that a small chunk of the WTC could plummet through the main portion of it, 80,000 tons of steel, like thin air, at near free fall speed. That is 100 percent impossible. Even a child knows that. It's common sense.

- Thousands of people from all walks of life heard explosions at the ground level of the WTC, just before the collapse. Some even heard them BEFORE the planes hit. This is well documented and there are many hours of video proving this. Even mainstream media reporters heard explosions and said it was a bomb. The simple explanation is that explosives were used or detonated, probably under the base of the WTC.

- Never before or after 9/11, have steel high rises collapsed from fire. Fire deforms a building gradually, and unevenly. You can't escape that. It does not demolish a skyscraper in seconds. Nor does it pulverize concrete to dust. That is a fact. You could pour kerosene all over the WTC and light it on fire, and the steel STILL wouldn't melt or even weaken. Only a deluded person totally out of touch with reality would deny that. If fire could do that, then the demolition company would be out of business and there would be no need to spend months rigging a building with explosives. Common sense. Even children know this. AE911Truth.org's qualified engineers and welders have tested fire's effect on steel, and found this to be true.

All lines of evidence say the official conspiracy theory and "fire collapse theory" are 100 percent wrong and 100 percent impossible. There's no way around it.

If you'd like to help AE911Truth.org, the producers of this film, please sign their petition and make a donation to their valiant efforts at:

www.ae911truth.org...

Here is a video of the ground under the WTC shaking, 12 seconds before its collapse. Isn't this obvious evidence of some kind of underground detonation device?