posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 08:15 PM
1. Depending on their behavior, the homeless being sent away from the church during the service surprises me. I can't think of a church I've been
in that would have booted a homeless person from their service simply for being homeless. As long as they were there to hear the Word of the Lord,
(as opposed to causing a scene or disrupting things) it seems to be diametrically opposed to the nature of the Faith to ask them to leave.
2. The collecting of the "offering" (***gotta love that old time holdover term!) has always been amusing to me. Going back to the Judaic roots of
Christianity, the people would bring their animal sacrifices to the priest, who would then sacrifice the animals according to the Law, burning a
portion of the animal for God & subsisting on the rest as food. This right was prescribed to them as it was presumed that these priests would spend
their days in commune with God or performing duties related to the Faith and, as a result, not have the time or physical resources to provide their
own food. With the progression towards Christianity came some subtle changes to these practices. Most early Christian "services" were not presided
over by any official "holy man", but were small gatherings, often at great personal risk of persecution, at individuals' homes. Those who visited
these homes would often travel long distances to do so, and would frequently bring with them gifts of food, incense, or baubles for the host of the
service as both a "thank you" and as simply a general gift for opening their home & heart. In actuality, Jesus himself told us his thoughts on
money collecting inside the church... the only time in the New Testament when He showed the emotion of anger was when he threw the money changers, tax
collectors, and vendors out of a chruch, citing that they were befouling God's Holy Temple. Again, a simple check of history shows that the majority
of the tax collectors in Jerusalem during the ROman occupation were actually Jews associated with the Temple itself.
Somehow, over the years, this has been lost. The Church seems to have completely forgotten "Give unto Ceasar what is Ceasar's and unto God what is
God's." God isn't money, God is spiritual, God is the Heart, God is the soul, and God is love. IMHO, the "offering" in Church should be an
offering of a prayer of thanks and a personal affirmation towards God... having nothing whatsoever to do with secular money.
***SIDE NOTE: I parenthsize "offering" because the term itself is quite charged. The concept of offering something means it can be rejected and is
very much alive with the energy of someone from a lower position hoping and begging that someone who holds power will accept whatever sacrifice it is
they are giving unto them. It actually may have had some justification 2,000+ years ago, when the blood of the sacrificed animal was burned & offered
directly to God as a resolution from personal sins. However, when Jesus was crucified, He paid for humanity's sins in whole. There is no more
offering of gifts or deeds to resolve man's sins... all that is required is devotion of heart to Jesus. Yet the term has held on because it grants a
tremendous aspect of power to leaders of the Church. I have always found it fascinating that the Church will defend the poor giving sums of money to
the Church by saying that it is their (the poor's) money and they are simply doing with it what the Lord has moved them to do... yet the same is
never equal in reverse... when you have someone who says they cannot afford to give a higher percentage to the Church, it is quickly assailed with
promises of damnation & claims that all money is "from the Lord."
I am not turning a blind eye to the blessings of God in the financial realm. I am, however, saying that Jesus was pretty plain faced when He said
that you cannot buy your way into Heaven. The comment regarding it being easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to
enter Heaven has been vastly exxagerated by the Church for their own financial gain. The "Eye of the Needle" was a small gate into Jerusalem. In
order for a camel to enter the city through that gate, it had to stoop and have all of its baggage removed. Think of this in spiritual terms. Jesus
wasn't saying a rich man cannot enter Heaven, He was saying that a rich man had to be very careful to not place more importance on his wealth than he
did on God and not become hindered on the spiritual path by their worldly baggage. Nowhere in there did Jesus advise the rich man to heap his riches
upon the Church.