It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
If that's the case, why is this law necessary? Isn't it redundant?
If there is 'reasonable suspicion' then an officer needs to be required to file on the record why they originally engaged someone and that needs to be examined by their superiors to make sure there is no abuse of the law happening.
I live in California, so when we are not preying to alah, bowing to Obama statues, robbing not lazy people or engaging in large homosexual orgies, we notice we have a problem here too...
now you just have to get elected.
When I heard Rove was against this law, it really made me start wondering. But now it makes perfect sense.
Originally posted by Captain_Sense
Anyone from the latino population whom votes or has voted for Republicans, has got to be absolutely DELUSIONAL, unless such Latinos are pulling in at least a few hundred thousand annually in salary.
Throughout history, research shows CLEARLY that EVERYTHING a Republican does is for the benefit of the WEALTHIEST folks. Democrats help the middle and lower classes. SO unless these Latinos are VERY wealthy, they are fools. Then again, the Republicans try to get the lower and middle class votes claiming the "faith card", and such idiots whom have fallen for that GARBAGE is beyond ignorant. There is NOBODY with less of a Christ-like character than a Republican. NOBODY.
Originally posted by Captain_Sense
reply to post by aravoth
You are not one of the brightest in regards to the Republican history huh? Obviously not. And I do not fit in the typical Democrat "classes", but I feel the rich DO NOT NEED ANY MORE SUPPORT, we can help ourselves. I just cannot tolerate "SPECIAL TREATMENT" to the wealthy, when its OUR LOWER AND MIDDLE CLASS THAT NEEDS HELP. Get IT?!
[edit on 28-4-2010 by Captain_Sense]
Originally posted by David9176
.
We'll be sitting here next year STILL talking about why nothing is being done with the border.
Originally posted by whaaa
Originally posted by David9176
.
We'll be sitting here next year STILL talking about why nothing is being done with the border.
And we will be discussing how the GOP shot down the Immigration law because they wanted their gardeners, cooks, nannys, etc. and the meatpacking, Hotel, Big Agriculture conglomerates, contractor, Restaurant chain lobbyist told their GOP representatives the reality of the situation. "We want our cheap labor" And if you do anything to adversely affect our profit margin; our political contributions will go to those that will listen.
Terrible public relation and financial dilemma for the GOP.
The only thing that will change is that green cards will be handed out to illegals like Walgreen coupons.
Money talks, BS walks!
[edit on 28-4-2010 by whaaa]
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by whaaa
Originally posted by David9176
.
We'll be sitting here next year STILL talking about why nothing is being done with the border.
And we will be discussing how the GOP shot down the Immigration law because they wanted their gardeners, cooks, nannys, etc. and the meatpacking, Hotel, Big Agriculture conglomerates, contractor, Restaurant chain lobbyist told their GOP representatives the reality of the situation. "We want our cheap labor" And if you do anything to adversely affect our profit margin; our political contributions will go to those that will listen.
Terrible public relation and financial dilemma for the GOP.
The only thing that will change is that green cards will be handed out to illegals like Walgreen coupons.
Money talks, BS walks!
[edit on 28-4-2010 by whaaa]
So how does throwing immigrants out of the country guarantee that their "cheap labor" will keep working for them?
Not makin a lot of sense there chief.