It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SO, continuing on here - please explain how Canadian doctors wages would be determined if the entire world was a socialist system.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
It was published on the NEJM's own site.
Link to the NEJM career site:
www.nejmjobs.org...
Link to study hosted on that site:
www.nejmjobs.org...
While the NEJM didn't commission the study, they published the study on their site.
Hence, "published by the NEJM" is a valid statement to make.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Fine, I'm not going to argue the point.
The fact is its a valid study and one that should not be dismissed.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
The method of survey sampling from a random list is no different from the methods used by political pollsters.
The sample size is adequate, the selection random, and the locations and specializations were also random.
Even if its off by 10% up or down, the numbers ARE STILL out of control.
Could you imagine if 10% of physicians left the workforce?
That's a HUGE problem.
In April 2009, we obtained data on a random sample of
6,000 physicians from the American Medical Association
(AMA) Physician Masterfile which includes current data
on all U.S. physicians, regardless of AMA affiliation. We
excluded physicians from U.S. territories because health
care reform questions may not be as relevant to them and
excluded physicians in training because of the limited
experience most trainees typically have with insurance
leaving a sample of 5,157. We categorized physicians
into four groups: 1) primary care (internal medicine,
pediatrics, family practice); 2) medical subspecialists,
neurologists, and psychiatrists; 3) surgical specialists
and subspecialists; and 4) the remaining, or “other,”
specialties. We randomly sampled approximately equal
numbers of individuals from each of the 4 specialty
groups. Sampling weights were created to correct for the
stratified sampling design in our analyses. The study
was approved by the Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Institutional Review Board.
Two of every three practicing physicians oppose the medical overhaul plan under consideration in Washington, and hundreds of thousands would think about shutting down their practices or retiring early if it were adopted, a new IBD/TIPP Poll has found.
The poll contradicts the claims of not only the White House, but also doctors' own lobby — the powerful American Medical Association — both of which suggest the medical profession is behind the proposed overhaul.
It also calls into question whether an overhaul is even doable; 72% of the doctors polled disagree with the administration's claim that the government can cover 47 million more people with better-quality care at lower cost.
The IBD/TIPP Poll was conducted by mail the past two weeks, with 1,376 practicing physicians chosen randomly throughout the country taking part. Responses are still coming in, and doctors' positions on related topics — including the impact of an overhaul on senior care, medical school applications and drug development — will be covered later in this series.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Yeah, some slight problems with your study.
1. it was conducted back in 2009
2. it doesn't ask how physicians feel about the currently proposed legislation.
Its also odd that other polls during the same time period have quite different findings.
The IBD/TIPP Poll was conducted by mail the past two weeks, with 1,376 practicing physicians chosen randomly throughout the country taking part. Responses are still coming in, and doctors' positions on related topics — including the impact of an overhaul on senior care, medical school applications and drug development — will be covered later in this series.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
I suspect the NEJM is playing with the numbers