A very valid point, but a line has to be drawn somewhere
For egsample, to grow a pound of meat, you need 25? pounds of grain (it might be 4, but still the point is clear), same goes with water etc.
I agree that I should have added (in animal case adrenaline, etc..)
Yes plants secrete many chemicals to signal other plants or animals, call them for help, repel predators (one plant secretes a scent that lures
ladybugs, when it is infested with mites). A good read (i heard) is
www.amazon.com... , and theres
also a thread about the side of plants that is not explored thoughout. It has been done by some russian scientists and the research was published in
some crapy sci-fi magazines (old news, maybe somethings better up).
What i ment by adrenaline in animals was also from purley medical perspective.
"The adrenal poisons dumped by animals fighting for their lives in slaughter re-create depression, fright, and anger in those eating the animal
flesh. Adrenalin is a long protein enzyme chain whose chain links are only partially broken by cooking heat. " (cant provide the source, youll just
have to google if interested, I'm gona do it myself when i have the time)
Anyways, this is a clear idication (if true) that animals produce harmful substances when igested (would make sence, as you wouldnt want your
predators to get stronger and stronger (silly, but somewhat true)). Also, plants are generaly helthier for you, they do not require so many variables
to produce a quality crop, whereas an animals requires sh*t loads of comfort, good food, compasion and care (not concentration-camp-like facilities).
If we cannot afford to take care of an animal the way its ment to be, I guess, we shouldn't be doing it in the first place.
Also, about the eating of the young
, most fruits are designed to be eaten (almost none enzyme-inhibitors, anti-nutrients, etc.) so their seeds
could spread. Yes, ts our fault we are flushing excrement to the oceans, destroying the seeds, which does not make much sence any way. (btw even human
manure has a very good value, if you know how to tap it).
It is a two sided argument and I think that the point is, if you cannot treat it right, you better not eat it.