It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whatukno
It's not illegal, but that person from out of state is not that elected officials constituent. The people from that representatives state are the people he/she works for, not me...
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Janky Red
On another note, do you actually think a living individual and a creation of business is the same? Please explain if you would...
Corporations and lobbyists are not synonymous. What you all are proposing is not allowing anyone to petition the government, stripping our fundamental rights from us, and using terms like "corporation" and "special interests" as scare terms.
Again, let me ask you, and maybe someone will finally answer instead of ranting and raving about corporations. What causes and issues do you support? Do you think they should not be allowed to lobby the government?
What you all are proposing is not allowing anyone to petition the government, stripping our fundamental rights from us, and using terms like "corporation" and "special interests" as scare terms.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by whatukno
It's not illegal, but that person from out of state is not that elected officials constituent. The people from that representatives state are the people he/she works for, not me...
Lobbyists and special interests understand something that you have so far failed to. Whether or not a Senator or Representative is from your state their vote still affects you. That being the case, why should I not have the right to petition them?
Originally posted by Starrunner
While I love the idea of putting an end to lobbyists it it never happen.
This is why: To end lobbyists congress and the senate have to pass the bill. And none of these politicians will give up their side pay for the good of the American governmental issues. Even if it was put to the vote of the american people and 100% of voters said no lobbyists the politicaian would find a way to shoot it down.
Originally posted by daddio
Originally posted by Starrunner
While I love the idea of putting an end to lobbyists it it never happen.
This is why: To end lobbyists congress and the senate have to pass the bill. And none of these politicians will give up their side pay for the good of the American governmental issues. Even if it was put to the vote of the american people and 100% of voters said no lobbyists the politicaian would find a way to shoot it down.
Again the original 13th amendment. Class "A" shares of stock are not held by Americans, they are held by Elitists from all over the world, these are foreign entities which bribe and coerce "our" elected representatives. That is wrong. We the People. what happened to that? The arguements of redress of grievances and all the other ones are obviously stated by people who have no idea about government and how and why it was created. MAN created government to SERVE him, not to subvert his naturally born rights.
I will say this once. Corporations are NOT naturally born, they have ONLY the rights which "We the People" have designated for them to have. The corporations have NO VOTE, they have NO RIGHT to a redress of grievances, they DO NOT have free speech. A corporation is an entity without a soul, period. It was given life by THE PEOPLE who gave life to government to again, SERVE the people.
Please read that as many times as it takes to soak in. If you disagree, please explain in detail, point by point and make it clear.
Originally posted by daddio
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
It make sme sick to read your posts, it is obvious to me and others you are a disinfo "person". YOU need to go back and read the Constitution.
Here's the bottom line, WE THE PEOPLE elect, see the word "elect", the politicians, corporations DO NOT. The people that labor in the corporations vote, but a corporation itself has NO VOTE. They exist at the behest of the government.
As stated in the Declaration of Independence, the government "derives" it's just powers from the "consent" of the governed. See, NOT THE CORPORATIONS. From the people! Nixon gave the corprorations the same rights as the people, that was an act of treason. The unratified 14th amendment re-affirms the corporations as "persons", also unconstitutional.
Britguy and Aggieman are correct, you are not. Your arguement has no merit or weight. You keep refering to the Constitution but do not know what it means or what it is for. Because corporations are "allowed" to exist, they must abide by the regulations of the government which "the people" have the ultimate say and power. NOT THE CORPORATIONS, again.
It is this right to exist by the government and people that binds the corporations from exerting influencial power upon the government. You can not tell your parents, when you were young, how it was going to be and who was the boss. You'd have gotten your rear end whipped. This is the same scenerio, and unfortunately you don't get it. Just like most people.
Really, how hard is it to understand that the entity that allowed you to exist in the first place, can not be run by you as you wouldn't "be" had it not been for the first entity? Get it? I hope so.
But unfortunately I believe that you will come back with some bogus arguement that makes no sense and carries no weight or truth. Free speech my arse. You don't even understand that. Sad really.
EDIT TO ADD; I know that the "electoral college" elects the president and the people do not. I also know that the State legislatures elect the states representatives in washington and the people do not, 17th amendment.
[edit on 1-1-2010 by daddio]
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by elitewolverine
The problem with your idea is that while yes the corporations are well represented the average person has no representation.
With special interest money going to our representatives, they have no incentive to listen to the voting public. If I remember correctly, corporations don't have the right to vote.
So why on earth should corporations dictate to our elected officials what to do when they have no say so over which representative gets elected?
Lobbyists Buy Congress
in Top 25 Censored Stories for 2010
Source: www.projectcensored.org...
Open Secrets.org
Title: “Washington Lobbying Grew to $3.2 Billion Last Year, Despite Economy”
Authors: Center for Responsive Politics
Student Researchers: Alan Grady and Leora Johnson
Faculty Evaluator: John Kramer, PhD
Sonoma State University
According to a study by The Center for Responsive Politics, special interests paid Washington lobbyists $3.2 billion in 2008—more than any other year on record. This was a 13.7 percent increase from 2007 (which broke the record by 7.7 percent over 2006).
The Center calculates that interest groups spent $17.4 million on lobbying for every day Congress was in session in 2008, or $32,523 per legislator per day. Center director Sheila Krumholz says, “The federal government is handing out billions of dollars by the day, and that translates into job security for lobbyists who can help companies and industries get a piece of the payout.”
Health interests spent more on Federal lobbying than any other economic sector. Their $478.5 million guaranteed the crown for the third year, with the finance, insurance, real estate sector a runner up, spending $453.5 million. The pharmaceutical/health products industry contributed $230.9 million, raising their last eleven-year total to over $1.6 billion. The second-biggest spender among industries in 2008 was electric utilities, which spent $156.7 million on lobbying, followed by insurance, which spent $153.2 million, and oil and gas, which paid lobbyists $133.2 million. Pro-Israel groups, food processing companies, and the oil and gas industry increased their lobbying expenditures the most (as a percentage) between 2007 and 2008.
Finance, insurance and real estate companies have been competing to get a piece of the $700 billion bailout package Congress approved late last year. The companies that reduced lobbying the most are those that declared bankruptcy or were taken over by the federal government and stopped their lobbying operations all together. “Even though some financial, insurance and real estate interests pulled back last year, they still managed to spend more than $450 million as a sector to lobby policymakers. That can buy a lot of influence, and it’s a fraction of what the financial sector is reaping in return through the government’s bailout program,” Krumholz said.
Business and real estate associations and coalitions were among the organizations that ramped up their lobbying expenditures the most last year. The National Association of Realtors increased spending by 25 percent, from $13.9 million to $17.3 million. The American Bankers Association spent $9.1 million in 2008, a 47 percent increase from 2007. Other industry groups that spent more in 2008 include the Private Equity Council, the Mortgage Bankers Association of America and the Financial Services Roundtable.
The US Chamber of Commerce remained the number one spender on lobbying in 2008, spending nearly $92 million—more than $350,000 every weekday, and a 73 percent increase over 2007—to advocate for its members’ interests. Pro-business associations as a whole increased their lobbying 47 percent between 2007 and 2008.
With record spending on lobbying, some industries face serious cut backs and have put the brakes on spending, but have not discontinued the practice. Automotive companies decreased the amount they paid lobbyists by 7.6 percent, from $70.9 million to $65.5 million. This is a big change from prior years; auto manufacturers and dealers increased lobbying spending by 21 percent between 2006 and 2007. Between 2007 and 2008 the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which testified before Congress with Detroit’s Big Three last year, decreased its reported lobbying by 43 percent, from $12.8 million to $7.3 million. Of the Big Three, only one company, Ford, increased its efforts, though not by much: it went from $7.1 million to $7.7 million, an 8 percent increase.
Among Washington lobbing firms, Patton Boggs reported the highest revenues from registered lobbying for the fifth year in a row: 41.9 million dollars, an increase over 2006 of more than 20 percent. The firm’s most lucrative clients included private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management, confection and pet food maker Mars, communication provider Verizon, pharmaceutical manufacturers Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche, and the American Association for Justice (formerly the Association of Trial Lawyers of America).
Update by Lindsay Renick Mayer
It seems like this should be a classified ad: “Laid off and looking for work? The lobbying industry wants you!” Since we posted this story on OpenSecrets.org in January, the lobbying industry has only continued to grow, even as industries across the board have continued to shrink, forcing hundreds of thousands of Americans out of work. This growth could be attributed in part to the economy itself—many executives are looking for some help from the government to keep their businesses afloat. Others are simply taking advantage of the opportunities that a spate of government handouts has presented. But as long as there’s a federal government calling the shots, lobbyists will be paid more and more each year to hold their clients’ fire to lawmakers’ feet.
Year after year we see increases in lobbying expenditures—in fact, 100 percent over the last decade—and the flurry of activity during the first three months of 2009 indicates that the trend won’t come to an end any time soon.