posted on Nov, 22 2009 @ 03:15 PM
I have been thinking about this idea for a few days and I said to myself, somebody must have figured this out by now. I then looked and found this:
Practical quantum computers are at least a decade away, and some researchers are betting that they will never be built.
This is because controlling individual particles like atoms, electrons and photons is extraordinarily challenging. Information carried in particles
always comes in shades of gray and can be corrupted or wiped out by the slightest wisp of energy from the environment.
A pair of experiments has brightened prospects for quantum computing, however, by making it more likely that a practical means of reading
electron-based quantum bits, or qubits, can be developed. Research teams from the University of California at Los Angeles and from Delft University of
Technology in the Netherlands have developed electronic methods of detecting the spins of individual electrons.
Spin is a property of electrons that is akin to the rotation of a top. The two spin directions, spin up and spin down, are magnetically opposite, like
the two poles of a kitchen magnet. The spins can represent the 1s and 0s and digital information.
Particles that are isolated from their environment are in the weird quantum state of superposition, meaning they are in some mix of the two spin
directions. This means a qubit can be in some mix of 1 and 0, which allows a string of qubits to represent every binary number at once.
This gives a quantum computer the ability to check every possible answer to a problem with a single set of operations, promising speedy solutions to
problems that classical computers have to churn through one answer at a time. These include factoring large numbers, a problem whose difficulty is the
foundation of most of today's security codes.
This is pretty amazing.
This gets around superposition and decoherence, two huge problems when you try to scale up with quantum computers.
The reason I said quantum computing is here, because I can't see any barriers to this.
Say you wanted to write the number 19 using binary digits on an 8 bit system:
00010011 = 19
You just assign spin up 1 and spin down 0. This would take advantage of non locality because spin up/spin down occurs at the same time. So just like
a qubit can be in a state of 1'and 0 at the same time, a particle can be in a state of spin up/spin down at the same time with it's twin
spin down/spin down/spin down/spin up/spin down/spin down/spin up/spin up = 19
The article went on to say:
The UCLA team's method of electron spin detection uses devices that are already mass-produced. The researchers flipped a single electron spin in
a commercial transistor chip, and detected the spin flip by measuring changes in current flowing through the device.
Several proposed quantum computer architectures call for circuits that can be manufactured using today's chipmaking techniques. "The transistor
structure used for our experiment [closely] resembles some proposed spin-based qubit architectures," said Hong-Wen Jiang, a professor of physics at
the University of California at Los Angeles. "We believe that our read-out scheme can be readily adapted in a scalable quantum information
processor," he said.
Electrons travel through a transistor via a semiconductor channel that is electrically insulated. The transistor is controlled by a gate electrode,
which produces an electric field that penetrates the insulator and increases the conductivity of the channel, allowing electrons to flow. Occasionally
defects occur, producing one or more spots in the insulator that can draw individual electrons from the channel and trap them.
The researchers sought out transistors that contained single defect traps, set the gate voltage so that the trap had an equal chance of attracting an
electron or not, and applied a large magnetic field to the trap.
The researchers next step is to to use pulsed microwaves to control the exact quantum superposition of the spin, said Elzerman. They then plan to
entangle two spins. "When this is done, all the basic ingredients for a quantum computer are in place," he said.
Coupling many spins and controlling their interactions accurately enough to perform a quantum algorithm is a matter of improving control over the
fabrication process, said Elzerman. "We need cleaner and purer materials and more reproducible electron beam lithography so that all dots on a single
chip are really identical," he said.
I put the last part in bold letters because he's basically saying that it works they just need to perfect the process.
I can understand why a quantum computer would be kept under wraps because it would put the entire internet in jeopardy. Nothing would be safe.
I do think government have this technology, one of the places funding this technology sounds familiar:
Jiang's research colleagues were Ming Xiao and Eli Yablonovitch of UCLA, and Ivar Martin of Los Alamos National Laboratory. They published the
research in the July 22, 2004 issue of Nature. The research was funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Defense
Microelectronics Activity (DMEA).
The reason I think they have this technology, because it's simple and easy to grasp. I didn't see any barriers to this technology but if others do I
would like to hear it. I tried to knock it down but I couldn't.
[edit on 22-11-2009 by Matrix Rising]