I am always of the mentality that you get the most accurate reports early then as the stories progress in the media they slowly start to change until
they have spun the story so far away from the actual event that they are no longer even close to accurate.
the reason i say this is that all i keep hearing about is 1 shooter and that he was Muslim and hated the war and didn't want to be deployed and that
he yelled "god is great" almost too perfect a situation for the media because they love that stuff but..
Some will say: "does everything have to be a conspiracy with you people?"
I will just respond with: "What about the other 2 shooters? Who are they?
There is no doubt in my mind something is very fishy here. You don't make blunders like that at a press conference where he even goes as far to say
2 are in custody
I know there are multiple threads on a possible conspiracy and there is the thread on the original story but they seemed to have dissolved into
shouting matches.
I just want to know what people know about the 3 shooters and whether that original info has been explained away somehow.
Even MSNBC just had a general on who said he didn't think the story of 1 shooter 1 hundred + rounds was plausible.he suggested many were killed or
injured by friendly fire.Also as I noted on another thread,something was "off" on the coverage.Something is fishy!
Originally posted by Beefcake
I am always of the mentality that you get the most accurate reports early then as the stories progress in the media they slowly start to change until
they have spun the story so far away from the actual event that they are no longer even close to accurate.
Absolutely right, as I've been saying in another thread. The "secondary explosions" that were reported on 9/11 (and never reported again) and the
two additional bombs recovered from the Oklahoma City bombing (also never reported again) prove this.
BTW, I beat you posting the Rick Perry video by 3 minutes.