posted on Sep, 30 2009 @ 03:37 PM
Thomas Friedman is another one of these guys who likes to sway which ever way the wind blows and the media love him for it. They regularly trot him
out as some kind of uber expert on anything involving national politics. The truth is, hes just another media tool.
In this latest example, he employs a common media tactic of re-writing history by simply forgetting the past. We all know that the media was quite
vitriolic towards Bush from the beginning. Challenging his legitimacy as president for the entire 8 years. Yet certain people in the media have
apparently developed amnesia and cease ever mentioning their behavior over the last 8 years. I assume they think the people watching will just forget?
Where Did ‘We’ Go?
I hate to write about this, but I have actually been to this play before and it is really disturbing.
I was in Israel interviewing Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin just before he was assassinated in 1995. We had a beer in his office. He needed one. I
remember the ugly mood in Israel then -- a mood in which extreme right-wing settlers and politicians were doing all they could to delegitimize Rabin,
who was committed to trading land for peace as part of the Oslo accords. They questioned his authority. They accused him of treason. They created
pictures depicting him as a Nazi SS officer, and they shouted death threats at rallies. His political opponents winked at it all.
A few things I want to point out in this paragraph. First he accuses "right wing" of depicting Obama as a Nazi, but the most prominent of these has
been the left wing LaRouchers.
Even so, we all know that
depicting Bush as Hitler was a staple from the very start and it was supported by the MSM.
And in so doing they created a poisonous political environment that was interpreted by one right-wing Jewish settler as a license to kill Rabin
-- he must have heard, "God will be on your side" -- and so he did.
Others have already remarked on this analogy, but I want to add my voice because the parallels to Israel then and America today turn my stomach: I
have no problem with any of the substantive criticism of President Obama from the right or left. But something very dangerous is happening. Criticism
from the far right has begun tipping over into delegitimation and creating the same kind of climate here that existed in Israel on the eve of the
What kind of madness is it that someone would create a poll on Facebook asking respondents, "Should Obama be killed?" The choices were: "No, Maybe,
Yes, and Yes if he cuts my health care." The Secret Service is now investigating. I hope they put the jerk in jail and throw away the key because
this is exactly what was being done to Rabin.
Either Friedman took a blow to the head and has lost his lost term memory, or hes purposely being misleading. I'm going with the latter.
Victor David Hanson said it better then I could:
The Rise of the Uncouth
The Left is now furious that, as the new establishment, the rules of discourse are not more polite. But from 2002-8, they (Who are
"they"? Try everyone from Al Gore to John Glenn to Robert Byrd to Sen. Durbin), employed every Nazi/brown shirt slur they could conjure up. NPR's
folksy old Garrison Keillor was indistinguishable from mean-spirited Michael Moore in that regard.
The New York Times gave a discount for a disgusting "General Betray Us" ad. The Democratic Party head Howard Dean flatly said he "hated"
Republicans. Hilary Clinton all but called Gen. Petraeus a liar in a congressional hearing. The New Republic ran an essay on hating George Bush (not
opposing, not disliking, but "hating" the President). Alfred Knopf published a novel about killing Bush. A Guardian op-ed dreamed of Lee Harvey
Oswald and John Wilkes Booth coming back to kill Bush. And on and on.
I'd only argue with Hanson on his recollection of when the Bush hate fest began. I remember violent protests at his first inauguration....