It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1). Massive stagflation (Hyper Depression) - if Ben shoves up interest rates massively to prevent people wanting borrowed dollars, to combat the deluge. American industry and housing will collapse under such interest rate pressure.
2). Massive inflation (Hyper Inflation) - if Ben keeps interest rates down to avoid immediate economic collapse. All the debtors, the majority of voters, will be overjoyed. Until they see what hyper inflation does to an economy, after a couple of years.
3). Complete full U.S. economic recovery. Ha! :-)
Originally posted by Sundancer
I think we're going to see Hyper Inflation, but it won't be soon. I think the fed will keep interest right where it is for a bit longer.
S&F for you.
As economies stabilise and recover, central banks will face the same challenge the Fed faced in the mid-1930s: when and how to reduce monetary accommodation and prevent the large accumulation of bank reserves on its balance sheet from being lent out, causing an inflationary expansion of money and credit. A fundamental misjudgment by the Fed was to assume that, as the economy revived, banks would manage liquidity exactly as they had prior to the banking crises earlier in the decade and hold only the legally required minimum. When the Fed sharply increased reserve requirements in 1936 and 1937 (see chart 1), banks responded by calling in loans to build a liquidity cushion above legal requirements, thereby sharply contracting money, credit and economic activity.
Just last autumn, Congress gave the Fed a new tool that will play a crucial role as it exits from its unusually accommodative monetary policy: the ability to pay interest on reserves. Previously, a recovery would mean more opportunities for banks to lend and so they would draw down non-interest-bearing reserves and expand credit and hence the money supply. Interest on reserves, however, can cut that logic short by providing incentives for banks to hold reserve balances rather than lend them out, as the Federal funds rate target rises. The Fed now has a greater control over the reserve choices of banks because it can raise the return on reserves relative to banks’ lending opportunities, and thereby better manage credit and money growth in a recovery. In addition, of course, the central bank can drain reserves directly from the system through reverse purchase agreements and the sale of long-term securities from its portfolio, among other means. The ability to pay interest on reserves also allows the Fed to offer term deposits to the banks, thereby committing the depositing bank to keep its reserves with the Fed for a specified period of time.
Complicating central banks’ exit strategy, both in the 1930s and today, is fiscal policy. (Monetary policy was not alone to blame.) Ahead of the 1936 US election, a temporary, targeted “bonus” totalling more than 1.5 per cent of gross domestic product was paid out to first world war veterans, providing a fiscal stimulus to an already rapidly recovering economy. The Fed’s concern about the potential for monetary policy to add to this stimulus was not unjustified, for the economy grew extremely rapidly in 1936 (see chart 1), although the Fed’s response was far too strong.
Originally posted by Sundancer
I think we're going to see Hyper Inflation, but it won't be soon. I think the fed will keep interest right where it is for a bit longer.
S&F for you.
Banks are opting to park their money due to the zero percent interest rates. Eventually, interest rates will rise slightly and the banks will respond by pulling their money out and lending it, flooding the market with US Dollars.
Okay, so why are we so worried about deflation, when doubling our monetary base should cause massive inflation? It turns out that this money is being stored in excess reserve accounts at the Fed.
There's some fairly solid evidence that the Fed is sending money over seas into other central banks, and having them pretend they want treasuries - in fact actually buying them for the Fed.
a deflationary spiral is not linear. When the debt burden becomes too great for the economy to support and the trend reverses, reductions in lending, spending and production cause debtors to earn less money. Defaults rise because they can't pay off their debts. Default and the fear of default exacerbate the new trend in psychology, which in turn causes creditors to reduce lending further.
3) Bernanke confirms vast sums have been leant to other central banks ("central bank liquidity swaps"). The figures show an increase from the end of 2007 from $24 billion to $553 billion at the end of 2008.
Classic quote: "So who got the money?"
Bernanke: "I don't know."
"Half a trillion dollars and you don't know who got the money?"
Welcome to The Real Matrix: Time for The Red Pill?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
September 11th Electronic Withdraw at Fed/Treas...$550B
US stops Withdraw...freezes credit/mutual funds
It starts around 2:00...
www.nytimes.com...
afp.google.com...
October 10th Electronic Withdraw at UK Banks...
www.bloomberg.com...
www.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by Hx3_1963
This post might shed some additional light on the subject...
PhyberDragon
www.abovetopsecret.com...
In fact...I would recommend reading all of his posts in that thread...
[edit on 8/14/2009 by Hx3_1963]