It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The movie "Jurassic Park" was a lesson in how resurrecting extinct organisms can go awry. A new project plans to take a safer route: resurrect a single gene from an extinct species of bacteria. This tiny snippet of DNA will be implanted in modern-day bacteria, with the goal of seeing whether evolution can be replayed in the lab.
Originally posted by TheAssociate
The movie "Jurassic Park" was a lesson in how resurrecting extinct organisms can go awry. A new project plans to take a safer route: resurrect a single gene from an extinct species of bacteria. This tiny snippet of DNA will be implanted in modern-day bacteria, with the goal of seeing whether evolution can be replayed in the lab.
source
This is pretty cool. There is volumes to be learned from evolution research, and hopefully this will yield some usable results. It is going to be interesting to see where exactly this research leads us. I really don't want to see dinosaurs brought back to life, but if the knowledge learned from this can cure some disease or help us to live longer, then it is justified.
TA
If this genetic anachronism evolves forward along one of the branches that the researchers have computed, then this will provide some verification of this molecular genealogy technique, as well as give support to the notion that evolution is repeatable and not simply a matter of chance.
*snip*
Gaucher and Kacar now plan to insert one of these ancient genes into a modern E. coli bacteria.
"These bacteria are going to be sick," Gaucher explains. That's because this gene codes for an essential protein, but the outdated version being inserted into the organisms works best at a temperature of 55 degrees Celsius, far above the 37 degrees Celsius that E. coli prefers.
Like a molecular Rip Van Winkle, the ancient EF gene will feel strong evolutionary pressure to adapt to its new cooler surroundings.
Originally posted by pieman
it cannot possibly fulfill its stated aims, to show that evolution is repeatable, and has no real advancement potential because we know quite well that life adapts as well as how it adapts.
this is a study in retro engineering lifeforms and little else, basically stuffing genes that have been selected out by nature back into lifeforms to see what happens. it's quack science.
it has no useful application, unless of course it is as a weapon. given the fact that it has been funded by a governmental organisation i would think americans would like to know what a chunk of their taxes is going to fund, exactly.
"scientists don't do that"??? sounds like blind faith to me.
Originally posted by pieman
what are you on about? seriously?
"scientists don't do that and get away with it" in what way, are the quack science police going to come along and arrest them? is there going to be a quack science tribunal?
and what fundamentalist mentality? i'm a fundamentalist what, exactly?
pull your head out kid.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Ad homs aside, the scientific community polices itself. You just need to review the literature to see what kind of reception a poorly thought out idea gets.
what? what ducks? there are no ducks, just little green men with tin foil hats. go play some sports or something. clean your room.
Please, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and poops through feathers, it's a duck.
Originally posted by piemanare you trying to tell a fellow member of a conspiracy website that he should accept the word of a scientist because they are monitored by other scientists? in relation to research connected to nasa? that seems to be based on retro engineering bacteria which are sometimes toxic to humans?
good one
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
I would never try to force reality on someone. The fewer people who accept reality, the better the chances for those that do. "It's a Darwin thing, you wouldn't understand."
Originally posted by piemanreality as dictated by you? by the new "don't ask and you won't get a stupid answer" scientific/religious elite?
yeah, if you want to swallow that stuff, you can have it and welcome, hope it doesn't choke ya.
i'm sure it'll be a great comfort for you that you held faith when whatever scenario you envisage, where my questioning of the official line becomes a problem for me, comes to pass.
Question "I really don't want to see dinosaurs brought back to life" How come?