reply to post by princeofpeace
really now? so you think we would be able to get away with just blowing up their nuclear facilities and leaving it at that. because we went into Iraq
to take Saddam and then we were supposed to get out of there as well.
you apparently have been living under a rock for the last 7 years, and don't seem to understand that things are WAY different then they used to be.
like i said, you can't roll into a country, blow up their nuclear facilities and call it a day and expect that there will be sort of retaliation from
the person whom you attacked, preemptively, and whitout and real reason. other than the d-bags in washington are fear mongering and trying to get
people worked up, because the next stop in the "Bush World Tour" is Iran
i also find it hillarious that you call me ignorant, people generally resort to half witted child like insults when they can't argue the points of
the argument presented to them
they are not as different as you think. i strongly suggest you do some research and try to quit with your bloodlusting. it's going to be the end of
the world as we know it. we shouldn't be over there (except for Afghanistan) and this is DAMN sure not the time to be talking about starting a
possible NUCLEAR war with a country, whom we KNOW doesn't have nuclear weapons (yet we are going to use that as an excuse to attack them anyhow,
because most people seem to forget that the IAEA SAID that they don't have nuclear weapons.) WAKE UP, you are falling for the same damn tricks we all
fell for in 2003
