Was the Burma cyclone a tool of the NWO ?

Having heard over and over how much the NWO desperately needs to reduce the worlds population this would be a elitists wetdream, knowing AIDS and cancer are just to slow. Do you honesty think if the NWO given had technology to create earthquakes, cyclone and other nature disasters they would not use it ?. Also is it just a coincidence that these nature disasters never happen in wealthy area's of the world ?.

what a massive loss of life

Originally posted by helium3
Also is it just a coincidence that these nature disasters never happen in wealthy area's of the world ?.

what a massive loss of life

The reason these disaster are so terrible in under developed countries is because they happen in areas that are not prepared and lack adequate communication avenues to warn citizens.

We have cyclones as strong and stronger than the Burma cyclone here in Australia, but due to law, buildings are built to code, to be able to withstand their winds. So thats why you dont here about them hitting Australia, because nobody (if very few) dies

Originally posted by helium3

Also is it just a coincidence that these nature disasters never happen in wealthy area's of the world ?.

How about Katrina? That hit several cities in the US, not just New Orleans, and while they might not have been the wealthiest cities in America, they were far from being the poorest.

reply to post by helium3

Also is it just a coincidence that these nature disasters never happen in wealthy area's of the world ?.

not true, like the post above, Katrina hit and killed people and destroyed areas from both sides of that fence. Most of the WEALTHY areas of the world are also in areas where a lot of that kind of natural disaster wouldn't happen due to the geography of the area. I live in Vancouver, B.C. .....VERY wealthy but because of the geography of the area we don't get hurricanes, tornado's or things like that....but earthquakes are another story yet we still haven't had any major ones to speak of........yet.

reply to post by helium3


Not a very effective way of reducing population - given that current birth rates in such third world countries mean that more people will have been born since the cyclone hit that could have died even under the very worst case scenario (I think it took less than 2 days to 'replenish' the deaths from the Boxing Day tsunami)

To make any real dent in human population you'd need to kill several tens of millions ......

Unless the Burmese military rulers are the NWO, I think we can safely rule them out

Source

Indian meteorologists say that they gave authorities in neighbouring Burma 48 hours warning before a cyclone slammed into the country, killing as many as 60,000 people.

The comments from Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) came after allegations from Laura Bush, the US First Lady, that Burma's military junta failed to warn its citizens of the impending storm.

“Forty-eight hours before (tropical cyclone) Nargis struck, we indicated its point of crossing (landfall), its severity and all related issues to Myanmarese agencies,” B.P. Yadav, an IMD spokesman, said.

The department is mandated by the United Nations’ World Meteorological Organisation to track cyclones in the region. “Our job is to give warnings and in advance, and we take pride in saying that we gave warnings much, much in advance and there was enough time to take precautionary measures such as evacuation,” Mr Yadav added.