posted on Oct, 18 2007 @ 06:53 PM
I thought just popped into my head.
If we never evolved the sense of vision, would we know light exists?
To us light plays a central part in our understanding of the universe. Its used as a constant in many of our founding theories in science. However, if
we could never see, would we know it was there? Would we have looked for it?
Sure light is just radiation, and we can detect other forms of radiation at different levels that we can't observe, but we study these because of the
effects they produce. Does light produce any other effects that we could detect without vision? Quantum physics, gravity, dark matter etc. are all
concepts that we try to understand by either the observation of their behavior or the observation of their effects. String theory, multiverses etc.
are concepts that we have created based off no observable evidence other than the existence of the universe itself. Could we ever prove these concepts
if we are never able to physically detect them?
This make me wonder that there may be other concepts that we can only ignore, just because we can't observe them. Maybe we are missing something that
is an integral part in understanding the functions of the universe.