9/11 Twin Towers UFO?

You have the Nose Out photo.

Do you think thats true.


I can't find the video analysis that provided another angle and showed
how the TV broadcast feed, whoever was doing it, didn't like it and
eliminated the Nose OUT on further video.

That must be part of the TV fakery series.

I have something:

www.youtube.com...

That has the video source of the Missile Theory.

Also posted on ats the UFO Theory:

I came across the 9/11 UFO:

www.youtube.com...

and

www.youtube.com...


I never liked the plane going in where the least explosion occurred,
so I don't think the wake of the missile will let me say that angle is any better.
The UFO going over the tower approaching toward the biggest
explosion point seems more plausible.

However by simpling using explosions high up and saying its planes is
just as good. Its what people would think since no one looks up in the city
unless they are hicks.

WOW
I'm reposting the links just to keep "late post readers" updated.

this link is a compilation of the "sighting"
The Only vid I've seen from this side - 20 sec in

I now have my mind changed on this UFO theory. I did NOT believe it was one UNTIL I saw the compilation video from the common angle COMBINED with the angle on the other side of the buildings.

The UFO clearly speeds past the buildings with the same timing as the compilation side recordings.

Is someone telling me that a bird flew past the camera on the opposite side of the side in a mirror flipped flight path? Even greater odds than this event happening while we were doing training exercises over the scenario... thppt..

There is a perspective in the second video of the craft as well. it disappears into the distance unlike a "bird" would. meaning the vanishing point is still on the screen when the object disappears. when it first appears, it is much larger and comes in from the side of the video.

My mind has been changed.

What is it? hrm.. military? I don't think so. My theory is someone had prior knowledge of the event and decided to do a fly by to get photos/data.. I guess this would imply time travel but I'm not prepared to back that statement up

Otherwise it may be a coincidence or the military DID have something there. While I believe we have ET technology or even advanced Tesla tech.. this just doesn't seem like ours .. < -- meaning human

b

This one repeats the sequence

I found it in a reference for one that you posted.

Now TV fakery would say its an overshoot of a path like they
did on the nose of the plane emerging on the other side of the
south tower. This would assume a head on crash which was canceled
in lieu of the side crash into the south tower.

Some think the fire ball is as fake as in movies
if a video feed is in control of people who have staged the
action before hand.


The long view shows two flights but not continuous.
One is the crash plane, then the dark line ufo on the other side.

Some how all video feeds would have to be controlled or worked
on before broadcast.

I captured the frame on one of the flashes and does look like a cloud.
Flying clouds are rarely seen except on camers as we well know in
the case of ufo documentation.

If you slow the images down, frame by frame, how in the hell would you think that would be a bird? Seriously! Use some common sense!

No bird, exactly.

I get a cylinder with motors at the ends as my best try at a UFO.

You got to be up on Zeppelin UFOs, researcher William Lyne spends little
time on them, but thinks Nazis suspended an old submarine.

Yet the WTC image appears to be descending, into the Hudson River?

That I didn't get and it appeared on both views as you say or has been pointed out.

A central dynamic video feed that went wrong or slow down to dive into
the river or a faster cruise up the Hudson at low altitude.

Man, I'm getting very good at this.