It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sound: The Reason Explosives Could NOT have been used.

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 05:52 PM
link   

"With the use of delays, we can control pretty much where the debris lands; we can control vibration; we can control noise levels. Timing a delays are the keys to just about everything in our business."


here's the source....911 research



posted on Apr, 14 2007 @ 07:44 PM
link   
Can't find enough sound?!

I'll give you even better: how about the Columbia Univ. Seismographic recordings of 2.3 & 2.4 Richter "events," each occurring approximately 10 seconds before each tower fell?

That's one two pretty big booms IMHO.

Sheesh. Next.



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 02:02 AM
link   

#1. the jets happend about 45 minutes before the towers collapsed. you would have heard sound a few seconds before the towers collapsed, not 45 minutes before.

#2: if they set the charges off while the plane hit..the buildings would have collapsed a few minutes after impact. they simply could not have stood once the charges went off, so the idea that the plane "muffled the sounds" is illogical.




uhmm... i know SOMONES gona yell at me for even saying this... but MAYBE they didnt set charges ALL the way around the building to cause a collapse? perhaps they only put enough charges to weaken the structure to make certain that it would collapse but make sure that it wasnt celar that it was CD???? Maybe... anybody? lol...



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 02:45 AM
link   
You do have a good point here Spawn, but you have to look at it from all angels, how much sound can a bomb really make when there's over 10 thousand tons of steel and concrete collapsing in on each other.

There was numerous eye witnesses who came out on television and said they herd "explosions" one guy said he herd three, a firemen said he herd 4.

A guy by the name of Scott Forbes who worked in the world trades, reported countless power outages at both towers and one the whole weekend before 9/11, the company above him earlier was moved to a lower level for construction reasons. All business' in the world trades were notified that new Internet cables were being installed throughout the buildings. And the really eairy part of all this was that all watch dogs working the world trades were ordered to stand down in the final week.


Also a group called FEMA "Federal Emergency Management Agency" was brought in, the week prior to 9/11 to exercise natural disaster and terrorist acts in New York.

Now this is really suspect cause NORAD "North American Aerospace Defense Command" claims they thought a emergency exercise was being conducted at the time reports where being made of hijackings around the east coast, so they also were ordered to stand down.

If you choose to say its by coincidence, by all means.

BUT the British train and bus bombings went through almost the SAME thing, Minus the hijackings of the planes. On 7/7 beyond the fact there were numerous tips on such attacks which the government chose to ignore, there were Jewish bankers in the area who were told to stay in their hotel rooms that day because something was going to happen.

This is where they split the people, everyone claims the information they were given about bombings on their buses and trains were just exercises planned for that day, and there was no real immediate danger to the public.

But how can you conduct a terrorist exercise and not have your dog sniffers on duty till AFTER the four bombs go off?

I'd say its funny but its really serious, a lot of people lost their lives.

Polls showed that American support for their President were down to just above 30% before the 9/11 attacks. Immediate action, a couple of speeches on good verses evil and your public support goes up like you just figured out the cure for cancer. Same goes for Mr. Blair, who was even worse sitting at around 25%. Till he got up on stage and got in on this good vs evil crap.



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 02:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by billybob
quote: PROBABILITY OF DRILL AND TERROR ATTACK COINCIDING BY CHANCE(london bombing) (10yr mean):
One chance in 3,715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000



Holly Jesus Wiffle Billy Bob, there isn't enough grains of sand on this planet to equal that number!!!! 25 ZEROS!!!!!


in less than a 10 year span Bahahaha



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 02:56 AM
link   
How do you explain the camerea that was filming from a rooftop, how it shakes and shudders about 10seconds BEFORE The tower begins to fall?

Something seismec had to of gone off, for that camerea to shake in the way it did.



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 03:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Praafit

Originally posted by billybob
quote: PROBABILITY OF DRILL AND TERROR ATTACK COINCIDING BY CHANCE(london bombing) (10yr mean):
One chance in 3,715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000



Holly Jesus Wiffle Billy Bob, there isn't enough grains of sand on this planet to equal that number!!!! 25 ZEROS!!!!!


in less than a 10 year span Bahahaha


even if it was off by a factor of a trillion, it would still be insurmountable odds(ten zeroes).

i mean, probabilty of the pet rock was probably similiar. human desire makes these kinds of things shaky at best. it IS a good illustration of the ludicrous thought that drill and attack occurred at the exact same time and same place by coincidence.

ditto 911 hijacking drills/attacks.

and together, i'd say the odds of TWO of the biggest events having the EXACT same coincidence....

there are not enough grains of sand in the whole universe to equal those IMPOSSIBLE odds.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join