This topic is in the Political Ideology discussion forum.  (rss)


Aunti Condi doesn't want to testify on 9-11




Topic started on 22-12-2003 @ 09:31 PM by Colonel


So, Aunti Condi is afraid to testiofy under oath about the 9-11 investigations? Why? What's she trying to hide? WHo is she trying to protect. IS she afraid she'll be murdered? What's the problem Aunti Condi?

Condi and the 9/11 Commission
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice is apparently not keen on going under oath for the Kean 9/11 commission.

Poised to convene its first hard-hitting hearings in January, the federal commission investigating the 9/11 attacks continues to be at odds with the White House over access to key information and witnesses. Two government sources tell TIME that National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice is arguing over ground rules for her appearance in part because she does not want to testify under oath or, according to one source, in public.

www.time.com...

Are you afraid that your Aunt Jemimah jig may be up with the Bush Crime Family if you tell the truth? What's up, Condi?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 09:36 PM by DiRtYDeViL


Beat you to it. I waited this broke hours ago you never jumped on it. I know you have a special place in your heart for this crooked bitch. So delete mine if you want lol.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 09:44 PM by Colonel



Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
Beat you to it. I waited this broke hours ago you never jumped on it. I know you have a special place in your heart for this crooked bitch. So delete mine if you want lol.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



You put yours on current events and this is the mudpit. You can't speak as freely as you like in current events as you can here, so I won't bother. There can be ATS PC. Here, do what ya feel.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 09:49 PM by DiRtYDeViL


Good point I'm still new. Anyway this article upsets me I want her to testify it’s her duty to testify and if she doesn’t it only confirms what many already know 9/11 was an inside job or at the very least they knew it was coming.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 09:53 PM by Colonel



Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
Good point I'm still new. Anyway this article upsets me I want her to testify it’s her duty to testify and if she doesn’t it only confirms what many already know 9/11 was an inside job or at the very least they knew it was coming.


She's not gonna testify. She'll be killed if she spoke the truth. These people are criminals. They're worse than the Mafioso. If Aunt Jemimah knows any better, she'll keep her hole shut.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 09:55 PM by Ocelot



Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
Good point I'm still new. Anyway this article upsets me I want her to testify it’s her duty to testify and if she doesn’t it only confirms what many already know 9/11 was an inside job or at the very least they knew it was coming.


They knew it was coming. I dont expect this 9/11 commission to go anywhere to tell you the truth. I mean just look at the Warren Commission. Lone Gunman? Magic Bullets? You can't trust the government to investigate itself.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 09:56 PM by DiRtYDeViL



Originally posted by Colonel
She's not gonna testify. She'll be killed if she spoke the truth. These people are criminals. They're worse than the Mafioso. If Aunt Jemimah knows any better, she'll keep her hole shut.

You mean like that women that accused Bush of rape?
thoughtcrimenews.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 10:00 PM by DramaQueen


I'm of the opinon that if the repugants see any more truth they'll go blind. I mean, seriously, when a member of the adminstration balks at testifying what does that tell you? Every crook that got caught balked to the press before they fell.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 10:03 PM by Colonel



Originally posted by DramaQueen
I'm of the opinon that if the repugants see any more truth they'll go blind. I mean, seriously, when a member of the adminstration balks at testifying what does that tell you? Every crook that got caught balked to the press before they fell.


So...so....true.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 10:04 PM by Ocelot



Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by DramaQueen
I'm of the opinon that if the repugants see any more truth they'll go blind. I mean, seriously, when a member of the adminstration balks at testifying what does that tell you? Every crook that got caught balked to the press before they fell.


So...so....true.


Nah they wont go blind. They're so brainwashed they would probably put on some sunglasses and look away from the light rather than face the truth.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 11:53 PM by RANT


Honestly I'm surprised "Aunti Condi" hasn't been sold down the river by Bush already. She got lucky the press dropped that CIA leak talk, because we know Rove or Cheney wouldn't pay for their crimes.

All in all, if she can just wiggle out of testifying she may be alright. It's sad this is mounting into either bust her or let it go. There's a reason behind some appointments.

I wouldn't want to work for Bush or Rush Limbaugh right now. It's always some bitch's fault.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-12-2003 @ 08:09 AM by joehayner


Wow, not one conservative reply in this forum.

Well then, I'll have to be the frirst.

Here goes....Smack!
Hey!
Mmm mm mmmmm mmmm mm mmmmmm mm m mmmm mmm m mm?
Mmm?
MM!
MMM!!!

[Edited on 23-12-2003 by joehayner]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-12-2003 @ 08:25 AM by Gazrok


Most people who want to keep their jobs, don't sell their bosses down the river...go figure?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-12-2003 @ 04:01 PM by Saphronia


This hearing is gunna be good. I've got my popcorn and pepsi ready. Line 'em up. What did you know? When did you know it? These questions should have been asked two years ago to both administrations. I only wish they could drag both Bush and Clinton in there and stick their butts on the hot seat. It always falls in on the aids and the staffers.

Condi's smart she knows they won't be behind her. They'll leave her high and dry. If someone's gotta go I suspect it'll be her and Tenet.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:























ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.185 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread