It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
there is a serious problem growing in the world
it's so bad that it has even spread to ATS
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
Is world net daily any more or less of a source than prison planet or rense?
Further, many stories on WND are stories that don't get covered on MSM.
World Net Daily: "Google has 'Liberal' Bias"
World net Daily has published another classic piece of disinformation: "Google dumps news sites that criticize radical Islam".
. Oh why, oh why won't the MSM cover these articles...I wonder...
"dirty rag-towel wearing ‘War Lords ' (tell me, isn't that an 7th century concept ?), eating road kill for din-din"
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
Is world net daily any more or less of a source than prison planet or rense?
Just asking, because not long ago, someone say a story on WND that fit their agenda and felt perfectly comfortable using WND as their source.
- WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Impossible: Why man couldn't have written the Bible
- SPECIAL OFFER
RETIRE THIS YEAR ...
And still make 6-figure income. Learn how
- High-blood pressure cured in 3 minutes ...
PAGE 2 NEWS HIGHLIGHTS
# 'Ray gun' cancer cure nears speed of light
# It's official: Global warming is hot air
# Panic grips Bermuda over tidal wave rumor
# How white was Jesus Christ?
Doubts grow over Muslim lawmaker's loyalty
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
people taking WorldNetDaily as a legitimate news source
Originally posted by Nygdan
I was actually watchin FOX news one day, and they actually cited worldnutdaily in one of their reports.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
you're right ALL, but still, i want a definitive ATS reference source, just to facilitiate the rapid debunking of worldnetdaily in a given thread
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
By its vary nature any reported news is biased. Every reporter just like every human being has his own filter for inform
And if youre gonna attack Fox for its bias you cant use O'Rielly, Hannity or Colmes or any of their COMMENTARY shows. Thats like attacking the op-ed pages for a bias. THEIR OP-EDS!!!
Its all biased from the World Nut to MSNBC.
If I see a house fire and I tell someone later that day what I saw its automatically biased.
Anyone with any sense knows that and if people dont or they like to get their info from a source that shares their personal bias than so be it. Nothing can change that.
If their full of hate and their only sources for information are their own articles than why attack them? Eventually theyll destoy themselves like a shallow gene pool.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Some of the other comments in this thread regarding Fox News makes it sound like they are next on your list. To be honest, it seems like you have a problem with conservative news sources in general.
It just seems peculiar to me that you are devoting so much energy to this. Because, after all, it would be incredibly simple to tear down practically any news source, such as MSNBC, CBS, NBC, etc. using many of the arguments that are used against WND.
Originally posted by jsobecky
What is the purpose of this thread? To totally debunk WND? Why?
So that it can no longer be cited as a source on ATS?
Some of the other comments in this thread regarding Fox News makes it sound like they are next on your list.
To be honest, it seems like you have a problem with conservative news sources in general.
it would be incredibly simple to tear down practically any news source, such as MSNBC, CBS, NBC, etc. using many of the arguments that are used against WND.
Maybe you should start similar threads for all other news sources. Now that would be interesting.
madnessinmysoul
WND is less credible than most supermarket tabloids