It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by siddharthsma
I think I just found a reason why the light has the same speed no matter which frame of reference you measure it in. Infact any object travelling at c should have the same speed ( c ) viewed in any frame of reference.
It has to be the same because of the law of the conservation of Action.
If a photon is viewed, it should have a length of zero because of relative length contraction. We would see the photon to have 0 length. This means its hyper rectangular area or Action is also 0. If anyone saw a photon from his ref frame to have a different speed and not c. This would violate the law of the conservation of action, because now he would see the photon to have a actual length...
So my general view is that relativity should probably be discussed AFTER the scientific community can come to a better understand of the whole subject.
Originally posted by siddharthsma
Ok, I've thought of something that proves that there is something fishy about the Law of the conservation of Action ( Energy *Time). Tell me what you think about it.
Click on the link below :
Originally posted by siddharthsma
ok, the format is bad.
You said.
So my general view is that relativity should probably be discussed AFTER the scientific community can come to a better understand of the whole subject.
I say, WE ARE THE FUTURE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. It is we who must strive to come to a better understanding of the subject. I therefore, see that is is only beneficial to us that we discuss such issues. Don't you want to be part of the people who come up with an answer to these problems ? Don't you want to be part of the SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY that will eventually solve the problems of Physics and come up with a final theory of the Universe once and for all ? Or do you want to wait for somebody else to come up with an answer. It would be pointless discussing the subject once everybody knows about it. The excitement of the dicussions would be gone.
I'd recommend understanding science before trying to advance it or creating a theory from the ground up.
but wait til you have a lot under your belt before you try to revolutionize anything.