It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
For the SR-71, the design mach number is around 3 to 3.2.
Denying ignorance is one thing, but blatantly disregarding the rules of aerodynamic design is just stupid.
Originally posted by Travellar
I believe it's worth mentioning that it is not impossible to exceed the mach cone of an aircraft, just very inefficient. Each point at which the sound barrier is 'penetrated' requires a certain amount of energy. If your wings spread out beyond this point, than you must break the sound barrier at all points along the wing beyond the mach cone. Thus, if the tips of the J-58 inlet cones were assumed to protrude just beyond the mach cone of the nose, there would be three points, and the aircraft would require three times the thrust.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Yet more of this "black projects are star trek" stupidity on this thread.
Please, simply look at the wing planform of the SR-71, and as pointed out by others calculate the shock cone angle and from that work out the aerodynamic design mach number.
M = 1/[sin(alpha)]
where alpha is the angle from the absolute nose cone to the outer wing.
For the SR-71, the design mach number is around 3 to 3.2.
Denying ignorance is one thing, but blatantly disregarding the rules of aerodynamic design is just stupid.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
What about the rules of mathematics?
1/sin(alpha) = ....?
Originally posted by waynos
How does the air enter the engines at mach 14 and not shred them into tiny particles? If the bubble is holding this air at bay what are the engines breathing?
This isn't aimed at you GZ, its for any of the mach 14 fantasists who might like to answer
[edit on 8-2-2006 by waynos]
Originally posted by Zaphod58
What is this common sense thing you speak of?
I will stand by my claim that Mach 4+ is the top speed.
museum of flight here in seattle we have a m-21 a variant of the sr-71 the only difference is that it has a spy pod
Originally posted by Zaphod58
What is this common sense thing you speak of?
I will stand by my claim that Mach 4+ is the top speed. Unless all pilots lie just to make themselves and their planes look better of course.