It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Catholic church for one seems to have come to the conclusion
that the start of the Tribulations are just ahead and that the church must
now work out its battle plan.
Originally posted by Watchtower
Javier Solana de Madariaga, born: 7/14/42
Family: Grandfather was Salvador de Madariaga, a famous Spanish writer who led an international disarmament committee after WWI. Defender of 1926-1935 persecution of Christians in Mexico. Became Spanish embassador to US, where he lobbied to get Mexico admitted into the League of Nations, despite this persecution.
Solana: Expelled from college for anti-Franco revolutionary activities. Received Fulbright Scholarship to the Univ of Virginia, where he studied physics. Demonstrated against NATO in 1977 with Spanish Prime Minister Felipe Gonzalez. Anti-clerical and anti-NATO activist in the mid to late 70s. At the time, a professed Marxist.
Elected to Spanish Parliament in 1977, officially as a Marxist (and remained one until 9/29/79 for unknown reasons). Appointed to the cabinet under Gonzalez in 1982, speaking out publically against the influence of US culture in Spain that year. Remained in cabinet in various political positions until 1995, when elected to NATO.
Self professed member of the Club of Rome, a group supposedly known for their advocacy of population reduction. Is credited with starting the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process in 1995.
During 10 days in 1995, he was given the sole power to negotiate the peace treaty in the Middle East. Also during this period, he chaired a conference in Barcelona, Spain that had among its agenda: Dealing with religious fundamentalism and eliminating US presence in the Middle East. During this period, the governing bodies of the EU gave him power to consolidate emergency managment powers and the authority to meld together civilian and military operations. By the end of the 10 days, he had control of a couple positions and was appointed head of NATO.
He wields scary power and seems to have the Middle East peace process as a favorite brain child. I am sure that current treatises regarding the enrichment of uranium in Iran, among other agreements are run through his office.
The EU is the counterpunch to the unilateralism of the US. Eventually, the dollar will collapse, American military/economic influence will dwindle away to pre-WWI levels (not without large-scale military conflict), and the EU will slide in as the new global hegemony that wields its own power through the global standard Euro and the geographically convenient NATO. Eventually, they will have a citizenry of 500+ million people and a polished reputation for putting out both the political and military fires that the US starts.
Once this happens, the call will be great for global equalization among the different nations based upon the Europen model of peace and safety. And what will be left is a socialist EU, largely non-religious (except for the growing New Age Mov't of "energies" and "inner self". Lord Maitreya, through the British organization Share International and Benjamin Creme, its spokesman (query their website), will gain favor with the largely humanistic populace of Europe and quickly gain influence. Together with the new political power structure of the EU, the two philosophies (one-world religion and one-world government) will come together as a new sort of Holy Roman Empire which the US will be in no position to resist.
Of course, this is all speculation. But in all, given the current state of political, economic, and military affairs, it is all too possible. For a decent website linking this scenario to the prophecy of Revelation, I recommend:
www.endtime.com (That's "endtime" with no "S" on the end of it.) They have some pretty good products available for study.
Originally posted by Wassabi
In December of 1998, at their Vienna summit, the EU's heads created the new Office of High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy for the European Union. The holder of this Office would direct their common foreign policy toward Russia, Ukraine and the Mediterranean. Out of over 1150 documents they generated at the summit, the document that created this Office happened to be numbered 666.
Originally posted by Wassabi
Office of High Representative - Which gives the ability to direct foreign policy, as well as emergency powers to take over in a crisis. Gives him access to play politics externally.
Originally posted by Wassabi
Secretary General of the Council of Europe - Puts him of at the head of one of larger decision making bodies of the EU, also giving him access to play politics internally.
Originally posted by Wassabi
Secretary General of the 10-nation WEU alliance - Making him the defacto Commander in Chief of the EU combined military.
Originally posted by Simon666
In the mean time, your anti christ has undergone plastic surgery and name change since currently, Lord Paddy Ashdown is the High Representative of the International Community and EU Special Representative.
www.euforbih.org...
The Council of Europe is not one of the larger decision making bodies in the EU but more of a talking club that produces a lot of paperwork which has little significant impact. It's budget is only 186,012,700 Euro.
I'm sure that makes 'em tremble in Washington, Moscow and Bejing, just from hearing the name alone.
Javier Solana, the Spanish Marxist who serves as NATO's secretary- general, warned that NATO troops "will not hesitate to take necessary measures, including the use of force, against media networks or programs inciting attacks." Three hundred American troops were sent to make good on Solana's threat by occupying a television tower near Tuzla, which had been held by Karadzic's supporters. According to the September 4th New York Times, "The Americans withdrew when Serbian hard-liners agreed to moderate their propaganda war against the Bosnian peace agreement." Robert Gelbard, the Clinton Administration's special envoy to Bosnia, insisted that the uprising in Brcko was typical of "a totalitarian dictatorship losing control." While it is entirely reasonable to describe the late Karadzic regime in those terms, reasonable people might also point out that the actions of the UN/NATO occupation force are typical of a totalitarian dictatorship taking control. Although the crackdown on dissent was not directly mandated by the Hague Tribunal, the seizure of opposition media outlets in Bosnia follows a precedent set in Somalia, in which UN troops seeking to serve a warrant on "warlord" Mohamed Farah Aidid seized Radio Mogadishu, which had been used by Aidid's supporters to broadcast views deemed unsuitable by UN authorities. (See "Behind Our Defeat in Somalia," in the September 5, 1994 issue of The New American.)