It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
JJ, I would buy you a beer if I could.
The bottom line is, Bush is the president, he set this in motion. See: 16 words in State of Union address.
That is an impeachable offense.
And remember, Clinton got impeached for lying to a grand jury. The SoTU address is no different, legally. Ask Schippers.
The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
* A British intelligence review released July 14 calls Bush’s 16 words “well founded.”
* A separate report by the US Senate Intelligence Committee said July 7 that the US also had similar information from “a number of intelligence reports,” a fact that was classified at the time Bush spoke.
* Ironically, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who later called Bush’s 16 words a “lie”, supplied information that the Central Intelligence Agency took as confirmation that Iraq may indeed have been seeking uranium from Niger .
* Both the US and British investigations make clear that some forged Italian documents, exposed as fakes soon after Bush spoke, were not the basis for the British intelligence Bush cited, or the CIA's conclusion that Iraq was trying to get uranium.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
And p.s.
I don't believe for a minute Americans are that stupid.. Bush did NOT get re-elected. He got reSelected through vote fraud.
Thine eyes do not lie.. I have NEVER in 36 years of life seen SO many people turn out to vote! It was incredible. Mass numbers turned out - and those extra voters were NOT standing in line for HOURS to vote for Bush.
Be assured of that.
Originally posted by junglejake
As to the people standing in line for hours not being there to vote for Bush, I have to disagree. Everyone felt that that election was of paramount importance. I know I did, and I tried to get as many people out to vote as I could. Our nation was (and is) at war, and in the midst of that war we were asked by our government to choose the person who would lead that war. We could choose the person who had been running the war so far, or we could choose someone else. The majority of Americans (people? ) who voted wanted to stay with the current leadership. They believed he was doing a good job, or else they thought the other guy would do a worse job.
Originally posted by junglejake
So did John Kerry. So did France, Russia, the UK, and Germany. The whole world seemed to believe he did, but Bush was the only one who went out and did something about it. He put his neck out on something he really believed to be true, and it got chopped because it wasn't true. The irony is the choppers were all saying the same thing he was, Saddam had WMDs, back before we invaded Iraq.
Originally posted by junglejake
I am aware of that, but I don't understand how that relates to Bush lying.
Originally posted by AlwaysLearning
Please help me to understand this phenomenon.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002
"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002
"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998
VIEWING THE DIEBOLD VOTE-TALLYING SCREEN PROHIBITED
Update - Tabulation results appear odd for July 26 election
Jim March, a member of the Black Box Voting board of directors, was arrested Tuesday evening for trying to observe the Diebold central tabulator (vote tallying machine) as the votes were being counted in San Diego's mayoral election (July 26).
www.bbvforums.org.../1954/8556.html
Originally posted by AlwaysLearning
However, the buck stops with Bush.
Originally posted by junglejake
It's actually pretty simple, I don't think he lied, I think he was wrong.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Originally posted by AlwaysLearning
However, the buck stops with Bush.
Buck who?!
February 24, 2001: "Saddam Hussein has not developed any significant capacity with respect to weapons of mass destruction," says Secretary of State Colin Powell. "He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors."
July 29, 2001: "We are able to keep his (Saddam's) arms from him," NSC advisor Rice tells the media. "His military forces have not been rebuilt."
Originally posted by junglejake
ECK, if everyone knew that in the mid 90s, why did Saddam kick out the weapons inspectors, why have I seen things on the History channel and Military channel from ex-USAF and Navy pilots talking about the SAMs and Migs flying around in the no-fly zones during the 90s? There may have been economic sanctions on Iraq, but a ton of money was being funneled into the country through the Oil for Food program, and it's not looking like that money was spent on food. Also, as stated in the quotes I posted before, in 1998 it was "common" knowledge that Saddam had WMD programs in place and was developing them, if he didn't already have them. As Chirac said, he'd used them before and there was no reason to believe he wouldn't save some for future use. Saddam gave us no reason to believe he wouldn't. If this is a lie, it was started long before Bush got into office.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
Without them, the man couldn't organize a fart at a baked bean factory.