It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Al Davison
Originally posted by masterp
Why should it be that religion depends on a piece of clothing? why would God create such a piece that would bring doubt and disagreement amongst His children?
We are sitting here debating if a piece of clothing is for real while millions of men, women and children are getting slaughtered every year in the name of religion.
We should either ban all religions or finally prove one of them as the true one. This thing can't go on for long, or else humanity will destroy itself.
My, my! Such drama!
Actually, I don't think we are discussing religion = we are, in fact, discussing a piece of cloth. Actually, we're discussing the history of said cloth. The conspiracy relates to the authenticity of this historical artifact and whether it has been deliberately misrepresented.
The "Saving Humanity from the Evils of Religion" forum is 2 doors down to your right.
Originally posted by abovereproach
Do you have Jesus's DNA by any chance? Because if not, what good is it as proof of anything?! Much less the divinity of Jesus!!
Originally posted by abovereproach
For me, the radiocarbon test results basically settled the matter--the Shroud is a (very well-done) fake. The idea that the bits of cloth taken for the tests are from later repairs and thus invalidate the radiocarbon results have never been anything but conjecture and sound to me like a case of "special pleading". And we should believe that ALL the samples came from "repaired" sections of the Shroud? Come on!! ...
Originally posted by masterp
Yeap, the drama was intentional.
But we are discussing religion, although indirectly.
Because if this piece of cloth is truely what it is supposed to be, then chances increase that the story of Jesus was true, and hence the Bible is true and Christianity is the one true religion (tm).
But if this piece of cloth is a fake, then Christianity takes another blow.
John 20:33 (NLT) - But when they came to Jesus, they saw that he was dead already, so they didn't break his legs.
Originally posted by VeeTwin60
[...]
John 20:33 (NLT) - But when they came to Jesus, they saw that he was dead already, so they didn't break his legs.
However, wasn't the practice of the day to clean the body and wrap it? If they had cleaned the body before wrapping, beings he was dead, no blood would have come out of the wounds.
Now, I'm not saying they DID in fact clean him, as it is not mentioned in any of the scriptures. And if that is the case, I can see how the blood would have transferred to the burial cloth.
My opinion - as much as I'd like for it to be real, I believe it to be a well made forgery.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Tony238
how the h_ell can you get an imprint on sheets with a flower
*sigh*
Just the same as the imprints of the coins on the eyes.
Imprints that you can actually see dates on the coins.
Items do indeed leave imprints on cloth and 'sheets'.
Especially items that have been through a high temperature situation.
Remember the sailors on the ships when the Nukes were tested in the
south pacific?
They had imprints on their bodies of change in their pockets, of necklaces,
of bottons ... Japanese people who were in the nuclear blast in Hiroshima
had imprints of stripes if they were wearing stripes, of prints on their
clothing ....
If Christ was in the shroud when He rose from the dead, it could indeed
have included a high temperature situation. Anything on or around the
shroud would have left an imprint. That's one theory ... high temperature.
So yes, Tony, it is very possible and actually rather probable that the
imprints of flowers would have been left, just as the coin imprints were
left.
Science ... it's an amazing thing when you understand it.
Actually, this makes sense. Christ died upright. The blood flowed and
dried while he was upright. Even the blood in his hair. I have no doubt
that it should hang as standing.