Colorado Rejected 14th Amendment Argument-Trump Will be on Primary Ballot

originally posted by: WingDingLuey

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: WingDingLuey

The paragraph I quoted earlier is the first paragraph under the section titled Application of Brandenburg.

None of your quotes have "Brandenburg" or any links either????? Hmmmm lol lol lol

Posting quotes but no sources????? lol lol lol

Where is it???

LOL indeed. One can't help but giggle at the irony of a rule called "The Brandenburg Factor" to foil Trump. Dark Branden strikes again!

5. Application of Brandenburg
288. The Court concludes, based on its findings of fact and the applicable law detailed above, that Trump incited an insurrection on January 6, 2021 and therefore “engaged” in insurrection within the meaning of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. First, the Court concludes that Trump acted with the specific intent to disrupt the Electoral College certification of President Biden’s electoral victory through unlawful means; specifically, by using unlawful force and violence. Next, the Court concludes that the language Trump employed was likely to produce such lawlessness.

The Court, therefore, finds that the second Brandenburg factor has been met.

Here's a link to the ruling
www.courts.state.co.us...

It's searchable. I just plugged in "Brandenburg", and viola, it's mentioned 23 times in the judge's ruling.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Finally !!!

The other Member refused to link !!!

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: JAGStorm

No?

Who then?

Powerball numbers too please.

I wrote about it in another post. I am completely puzzled myself.
It is actually a little concerning because I’m not getting a “feeling” for anyone, which makes me wonder if something will happen, or if it will be a stale mate or something else. Will war break out before that point and disturb voting.
Some world psychics have predicted it will be a woman. It didn’t look like Kamala. I didn’t get that feeling though.
You guys have seen my track record. I haven’t been wrong once and I predicted these things way way ahead of time without the influence of others.

The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that Trump is not eligible to be on the primary ballot.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that Trump is not eligible to be on the primary ballot.

If true (haven’t looked) Riddle me this…who are the real facist nazis?

a reply to: Threadbarer

It’s amazing that you cheer on a dictatorship. What are you going to do when they come for you? Comply with all their wishes? You seem to be in alignment with this.

a reply to: Threadbarer

We are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory, and that this
case presents several issues of first impression. But for our resolution of the
Electors’ challenge under the Election Code, the Secretary would be required to
include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.

Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme
Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s
deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is
sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the
stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include
President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt
of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.

Court Document (PDF)

. . . . . .And so it begins. . . the Banana-ing of our Republic.

This is completely insane....another 'no proof' push it over the line argument. The first time in history. Colorado is a dumpster fire of liberal garbage anyways.....

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Threadbarer

We are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory, and that this
case presents several issues of first impression. But for our resolution of the
Electors’ challenge under the Election Code, the Secretary would be required to
include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.

Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme
Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s
deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is
sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the
stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include
President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt
of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.

Court Document (PDF)

No Due Process!!

Innocent until PROVEN guilty!!

We are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory, and that this
case presents several issues of first impression. But for our resolution of the
Electors’ challenge under the Election Code, the Secretary would be required to
include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.

Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme
Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s
deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is
sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the
stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include
President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt
of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
. . . . . .And so it begins. . . the Banana-ing of our Republic.

originally posted by: WingDingLuey

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Threadbarer

We are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory, and that this
case presents several issues of first impression. But for our resolution of the
Electors’ challenge under the Election Code, the Secretary would be required to
include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.

Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme
Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s
deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is
sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the
stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include
President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt
of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.

Court Document (PDF)

No Due Process!!

Innocent until PROVEN guilty!!

We are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory, and that this
case presents several issues of first impression. But for our resolution of the
Electors’ challenge under the Election Code, the Secretary would be required to
include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.

Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme
Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s
deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is
sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the
stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include
President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt
of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.

Exactly right.

No due process, no indictment and certainly not allowed a defense.

• The district court did not err in concluding that the events at the U.S.
Capitol on January 6, 2021, constituted an “insurrection.”
• The district court did not err in concluding that President Trump
“engaged in” that insurrection through his personal actions.

a reply to: Threadbarer

All the ketchup within tantrum distance of Mar a Lago has been placed in lockdown.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
. . . . . .And so it begins. . . the Banana-ing of our Republic.