It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
Seems that the jokes just write themselves: Hunter is expected to argue that gun laws forbidding purchase by drug users violates their 2nd amendment rights.
Interesting twist, I think!
redstate.com...
I'm a little confused, here.
In discussions of gun laws, the argument seems to be that gun ownership should not be restricted and things like red flag laws are abusive. So he's actually standing firm on principles mentioned here.
Why aren't 2nd Amendment people here supporting his right to have guns?
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: CoyoteAngels
Why would Hunter Biden be using RedState to propagate his arguments to the general public?
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: CoyoteAngels
Why would Hunter Biden be using RedState to propagate his arguments to the general public?
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: CoyoteAngels
he may inadvertently solve the current conundrum people in pot friendly states face. If you smoke weed, even if it's legal, you have to answer the question truthfully, and that might negate your ability to own a firearm.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
Seems that the jokes just write themselves: Hunter is expected to argue that gun laws forbidding purchase by drug users violates their 2nd amendment rights.
Interesting twist, I think!
redstate.com...
I'm a little confused, here.
In discussions of gun laws, the argument seems to be that gun ownership should not be restricted and things like red flag laws are abusive. So he's actually standing firm on principles mentioned here.
Why aren't 2nd Amendment people here supporting his right to have guns?