posted on Jul, 13 2003 @ 09:32 PM
silikonrat
I agree with your sentiments.
It is very apparent, for example, that the majority of netizens at this community have never read the pre-determined PNAC/Bush agenda, which included
the plans to invade the Middle East for strategic US purposes (documented in 1998-99) and which became much more ready for implementation after the
'Pearl Harbour' events of 9/11, after which 'president' George W Bush said "we have hit the trifecta".
www.newamericancentury.org
The mainstream media will support this administration until their shareholders know they will not be damaged by not supporting it.
Objective informational media will present all the facts available and allow readers to make their own assessment.
As far as a call to action goes, I think most people at this site are happier to talk than to act, with the exception of a few that promote some sort
of combined or pooled effort. Most rebuttals are based on excuses or the need to preserve the status quo. I find some of the people here particularly
uninspiring, but we are all equally entitled to say things of substance or of little consequence.
I do consider, however, that influencing people's opinion or widening their experience through exposing them to things they would otherwise not read
or contemplate, is a worthwhile endeavor.
By the way, are you a 'newbie' or an old hand with a different hat on?