It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to that you have less mass than the moon so you have more gravity so we should be able to put objects in orbit around you like we did around the moon. I think you got your wires crossed. Even if you never understand Newton's gravitation equation, you should be able to understand this:
originally posted by: McGinty
less mass increases the force of the planets gravity
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: LookingAtMars
What about the size of it? If it's the size of HI then would it throw the moon off of its orbit or anything? If you mined it, needed the resources, and removed it all?
The amount of money and resources required to do any kind of lunar mining is never going to be repaid by what they mine. The only use for anything mined on the moon is on the moon, so it's not going to be changed by anything we can do to it.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
According to that you have less mass than the moon so you have more gravity so we should be able to put objects in orbit around you like we did around the moon. I think you got your wires crossed.
originally posted by: McGinty
less mass increases the force of the planets gravity
It's not clear either way but that is also not true. The gravitational force resulting from an object like the moon being attracted to Earth is proportional to the mass, so if the moon had less mass, then there would be less force accelerating it toward the Earth, not more, which you probably already know, but for the sake of anybody who doesn't know that.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
To be fair I think he was trying to say that the influence of Earth's gravitational field would increase if the moon had less mass