It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: lightedhype
All it would take is a major government issuing their own, with control of all the nodes, thus being centralized, which while defeating the entire purpose and vision of Satoshi, and then a cryptocurrency with a blockchain would be a fiat.
When this happens, bitcoin or other alts would very likely remain around for channels of official corruption alone let alone actual positive things they offer.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: nOraKat
Imagine if governments can no longer create money out of thin air to bail out their favorite banks and corporations? They would not allow that.
To be fair it isn't exactly like Bitcoin is commodity-backed either, most of the Bitcoin mining took place in China as well.
“The mining operation owned by a company called TianJia WangLuo located inside BaJiaoQi hydroelectric power plant has over 5,800 mining machines totaling more than 40 petahashes of processing power. The mining yields around 27 coins daily. This plant uses 7,000 units of energy an hour, amounting to 168,000 units of energy (kWh) a day, as the national average cost of electricity is about RMB 0.40 ($0.06) a unit, the cost of electricity for the plant is around RMB 6,720 ($1,000) a day.”
This China business is just a bump in the road. ..Cryptocurrencies aren't going anywhere.
originally posted by: Jubei42
The thing I don't like about bitcoins is :
-Too much fluctuation in the value. It's not a stable currency, too much risk
-There are a finite amout of bitcoins which has halmarks of a pyramid scheme
-The way new bitcoins are created is inefficient, massive amounts of energy wasted on useless calculations
The mining operation owned by a company called TianJia WangLuo located inside BaJiaoQi hydroelectric power plant has over 5,800 mining machines totaling more than 40 petahashes of processing power. The mining yields around 27 coins daily.
originally posted by: nOraKat
What an astonishing realization. What an ideal situation for renewable power companies to build mining operations right on site.
I guess they will be the ones with all the initial dough.
I don't think this would be the case in the future if it were adopted.
originally posted by: spliffster
But it is not possible to create bitcoin just like that isn't it? There is a finite number of bitcoins and each is worth dollars or other currency and then there are altcoins which can be exchanged for bitcoins or are worth an amount of bitcoins so those are dependent on bitcoin or not? I mean if all people exchanged currency for bitcoin and altcoin and went on doing business as usual it should work, except for the volatility parts.
Even though it is simply computing power sold to other countries, it might be too difficult for the Chinese government to administrate these farms? Or maybe the Chinese government will come up with state owned plants or something. Or it's a bandwith issue.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: spliffster
But it is not possible to create bitcoin just like that isn't it? There is a finite number of bitcoins and each is worth dollars or other currency and then there are altcoins which can be exchanged for bitcoins or are worth an amount of bitcoins so those are dependent on bitcoin or not? I mean if all people exchanged currency for bitcoin and altcoin and went on doing business as usual it should work, except for the volatility parts.
There is no possible way to have a gold-back currency, let alone a crypto-currency. Who will hold the gold? Where will it be held?
I think it's more of a control issue and an erosion of the state-run currency.
This is all excellent news. It will end a lot of corruption. Bitcoin is subversive and is allowing some very vile people to do business globally. They have an easier time operating globally than Bank of England, lol.
originally posted by: spliffster
That's not what I meant, I meant a bitcoin is basically worthless data on a drive until someone wants to give 3000 dollars for it, someone else might give 300 and another 3 million. But that is all in dollars, without a dollar, what is a bitcoin, just 1 unit, will the bitcoin become like what gold used to be in relation to a currency so bitcoin the gold and altcoin the actual currency? That's what I'm trying to get my head around and never gotten in economics.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: spliffster
That's not what I meant, I meant a bitcoin is basically worthless data on a drive until someone wants to give 3000 dollars for it, someone else might give 300 and another 3 million. But that is all in dollars, without a dollar, what is a bitcoin, just 1 unit, will the bitcoin become like what gold used to be in relation to a currency so bitcoin the gold and altcoin the actual currency? That's what I'm trying to get my head around and never gotten in economics.
No, because gold has actual intrinsic value and a crypto-currency does not.