Chemtrails, the new ozone-layer

NASA - New Simulation Shows Consequences of a World Without ...

New Simulation Shows...

The year is 2065. Nearly two-thirds of Earth's ozone is gone -- not just over the poles, but everywhere. The infamous ozone hole over Antarctica, first discovered in the 1980s, is a year-round fixture, with a twin over the North Pole. The ultraviolet (UV) radiation falling on mid-latitude cities like Washington, D.C., is strong enough to cause sunburn in just five minutes. DNA-mutating UV radiation is up 650 percent, with likely harmful effects on plants, animals and human skin cancer rates.

Solar radiation management is the word.

Most sites give wrong info, intentionally or not.
The ozone-layer used to be responsible for the filtering of radiation.

Now the ozone-layer is gone, we need a substitute.
That's were the chemtrail-planes come in.

It's the choice between a quick dead of radiation,
or a slow dead and delay the execution with chemtrails.

Policy seems to be to ignore all accusations, to deny and even attack those who complain about them.
Tin(foil) hat, conspiracy theorist, crazy.

The chemtrails are real and worse we do need them.
They are the new ozone-layer.

It's common sense.
The R in SRM, Solar Radiation Management, stands for radiation.

Disinfo-agents try to distract you, by naming things like weather modification, sunlight reflection, preventing global warming etc .
When you find out those things are bullocks you probly will dismis the whole Solar Radiation Management explenation.

Only in the tropics is sufficient ozone to protect the flora.
Without chemtrails our food-supply would not survive.

It's my conclusion, just mine.
I came to it, after I had all other explanations ruled out.

What ever explanation is left, must be the right one.

Chemtrails make our new artificial ozone-layer.

The earth needs a protection filter.

Every pool of bright people should be working on a solution.
Every University, Cern, Darpa etc should be working, primary on the recovery of the ozone layer.

Even the military should be searching for a solution.
Before the army starts to like this enemy and wish to stay in war for ever.

The very existence of live on earth is at steak here.
The soil will become poisonous.

Cows outside eat every day a fresh layer of aluminium-oxide, barium and strontium every single day.
Milk products , like cheese or butter, can't be safe anymore.

The poison that doesn 't leave the cow, adds up in it's body.
Year after year, more and more poison is accumulating , making the meat poisonous.

We are at the end of the food-chain.
We are forced to eat the food that’s comes of the land.
Eating poison, poisoning ourselves.

All because of chemtrails and we can't stop.

For those who say;
The chemtrails are a imaginary non existing problem only seen by crazy tinfoil hat wearing crazy people.
Chemtrails do not exist, there are only ordinary contrails.
I say, the joke is on you!
It doesn't work any more.

Every pool of bright people should be working on a solution.
Every University, Cern, Darpa etc should be working, primary on the recovery of the ozone layer.

Ground all air traffic? The day after 911, the skies were the prettiest blue...

The ozone layer is not gone.

a reply to: Phage

Tell NASA.

Below is a google paste of NASA.

NASA - New Simulation Shows Consequences of a World Without ...

[Site popularity rank: #1,146] www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/world_avoided.html
Mar 18, 2009 - The ozone layer over the far northern hemisphere -- once relatively robust compared to the ... Nearly two-thirds of Earth's ozone is gone -- not just over the poles, but everywhere

a reply to: Wasta
Let me help

The year is 2065. Nearly two-thirds of Earth's ozone is gone -- not just over the poles, but everywhere.

www.nasa.gov...

"We simulated a world avoided," said Newman, "and it's a world we should be glad we avoided."

You know what a simulation is, right?


www.engadget.com...

a reply to: Phage

So it's even worse?

www.usatoday.com...

a reply to: intrptr

Come live where I am, clear blue sky almost every single day of the year.

a reply to: Wasta
Ok.

Why did you omit the part of the article which says the scientific simulation was talking about what the world would have looked like by 2065 if there had not been a ban on CFC's?

Did you miss that part of your copy and paste or was it intentional?

a reply to: Wasta

So it's even worse?

No. Near record does not mean worse. It means better, actually. "Record" would mean worse.
Your source:

The hole fluctuates in size from year to year. It's typically at its largest after the cold of winter and smallest after summer. (The seasons are opposite in the Southern Hemisphere). The WMO stressed that temperatures in the Antarctic stratosphere vary each year, so some years the ozone hole is relatively small and other years relatively large.

The large size of the hole this year does not reverse the projected long-term recovery of the ozone layer in the coming decades. Full recovery of the ozone layer should occur by around 2070, according to the WMO

www.usatoday.com...


www.engadget.com...

a reply to: Chadwickus

Skin-cancer on the rise?
Due to the lack of a sufficient ozone-layer?

Don't forget the sunscreen fliter factor X

So no ozone-hole in Australia?
Maybe I will come living over there then.

I write or paste just an nasa report.
They are known to be great liars.
But it's their report that claims that 66% of the ozone-layer has gone.
That was in 2009.

It's has become worse every year since then.
Worse diminishing ever of the ozone-layer in 2015.

So there can't be much left of it.

Nasa is a big criminal prankster, stealing huge amounts of money.

www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...

BTW, the shuttle should come back as a glider.
But each end every time you can hear the huge jet-engines roaring.

a reply to: Wasta

But it's their report that claims that 66% of the ozone-layer has gone.
That was in 2009.

False. In 2009 there was a computer simulation which showed that if CFCs had not been banned, two thirds of the ozone would be gone in 2065

The year is 2065. Nearly two-thirds of Earth's ozone is gone -- not just over the poles, but everywhere.

www.nasa.gov...

"We simulated a world avoided," said Newman, "and it's a world we should be glad we avoided."

You know what a simulation is, right?

Worse diminishing ever of the ozone-layer in 2015.

False. In the winter of 2015 the size of the Antarctic ozone "hole" was near record size. That is very different from "Worse diminishing ever of the ozone-layer."

Stop making things up.

a reply to: Gothmog

In the year 2525...

a reply to: Wasta

Umm, you seriously have no grasp on how chemical compounds work. Chemtrails CANNOT replace the ozone, unless they are injecting direct o3 into it, in which case you would never see it.

Decades of unregulated refrigeration is what took a toll on the ozone layer. If you really want to be educated start your search there. Phage already gave you a hint with CFC's

Closed for Staff review.