It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: Zerodoublehero
Have you not read hecates post? Yes, get them to sweep the highway. But what happens to the guy already employed to sweep the highway? Oh, the authority realises that they can get benefit recipients to do it for nothing so the fire their original sweeper.
let's make this perfectly clear. IF THERE IS WORK THERE TO BE DONE EMPLOY THEM TO DO IT AND PAY A LIVING WAGE, whether that's sweeping roads ,cleaning municipal building or any community work it should be payed for doing that job not expecting it to be done for free. And please don't say "oh, it's not free as they are getting benefit". Benefit is payed by the government not the local authorities. The local authorities get the work done for nothing.
originally posted by: makemethink
a reply to: Azureblue
I don't have an issue with welfare. There are many people that have no choice but to receive it. What I do have a problem with it people taking advantage of it. For example, a few days ago I was at the grocery store and the women in front of me bought 4 or 5 12 packs of soda and some candy for her daughter (not, judging her on buying candy for her daughter. The kids shouldn't have to suffer) with her EBT card/food stamps. On another transaction, she bought 4 huge bottles of hard alcohol and paid cash. If anything it made me sad for the beautiful little girl that sees this as normal. I'm guessing her mother didn't work. Don't you think the quality of the childs life would change if she were to see her mom leaving and going to a job to earn those food stamps.
I grew up with a single mother who always worked. I had a father whom was a business owner that also contributed quite a bit. So I'm well aware my mother had plenty of help that many of these single mothers don't have. But I don't even think those on welfare are happy being on it, and would feel better if they could say they earned their money. Don't you?
originally posted by: makemethink
a reply to: Azureblue
I never even considered it going back into the economy. Judging from that point of view, I now see it as less of a liability to the state. Thank you for that.
Even so, wouldn't it be nice if the recipients had to do their part to contribute some elbow grease to their county wouldn't it make it more of a win?