It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Forensick
Why would the Navy need carrier capable UAV for ISR? Couldn't you just use the numerous assets doing that already like satellites, RQ-180, SR-72 U2 etc.
I can't imagine a carrier group sitting near a peer nation gathering ISR, far too risky no? Wouldn't that be for the strategic assets?
originally posted by: Sammamishman
originally posted by: Forensick
Why would the Navy need carrier capable UAV for ISR? Couldn't you just use the numerous assets doing that already like satellites, RQ-180, SR-72 U2 etc.
Because the Navy doesn't want to rely on or wait around for the Air Force.
I can't imagine a carrier group sitting near a peer nation gathering ISR, far too risky no? Wouldn't that be for the strategic assets?
The Navy wants an asset to be able to go in ahead of the strike package, undetected, look for targets of opportunity, and be able to hang around after the strike to do battle damage assessment. Who doesn't want that?