It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: StratosFear
I get the feeling we got our hands "slapped" or something before we really got going with our space program.
Would you find it difficult to believe that there is possibly a secret space program which has a higher funding than what the public see?
The United States' spy satellite agency is giving NASA two spare space telescopes free of charge, each potentially more powerful than the Hubble Space Telescope, NASA officials announced today (June 4).
The two spy satellite telescopes were originally built to fly space-based surveillance missions for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), but will be repurposed by NASA for astronomical research instead. Their donation to NASA was revealed in a surprise announcement.
Both NRO space telescopes have a main mirror nearly 8 feet wide (2.4 meters), rivaling the Hubble Space Telescope, and also carry a secondary mirror to enhance image sharpness, according to press reports. NASA's Hubble telescope is a space icon that has been beaming stunning photos to Earth for 22 years.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: StratosFear
I get the feeling we got our hands "slapped" or something before we really got going with our space program.
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: StratosFear
I get the feeling we got our hands "slapped" or something before we really got going with our space program.
Would you find it difficult to believe that there is possibly a secret space program which has a higher funding than what the public see?
Redmond, Washington – July 16, 2015 – Planetary Resources, Inc., the asteroid mining company, announced today that its Arkyd 3 Reflight (A3R) spacecraft deployed successfully from the International Space Station’s (ISS) Kibo airlock and has begun its 90-day mission. The demonstration vehicle will validate several core technologies including the avionics, control systems and software, which the company will incorporate into future spacecraft that will venture into the Solar System and prospect for resource-rich near-Earth asteroids.
The A3R launched to the ISS onboard the SpaceX Falcon 9 in April as a part of the CRS-6 crew resupply mission. “Our philosophy is to test often, and if possible, to test in space. The A3R is the most sophisticated, yet cost-effective, test demonstration spacecraft ever built. We are innovating on every level from design to launch,” said Chris Lewicki, president and chief engineer, Planetary Resources, Inc. “By vertically integrating the system at our facility in Redmond, we are in constant control of every component, including the ones we purchase off the shelf and the others that we manufacture using 3D printers.”
originally posted by: game over man
a reply to: MystikMushroom
There are a lot of complications with living in space, a mining operation is going to be nearly 100% robotic. ET's very well could be on the moon but eventually ET's are going to have to live with us, we are going to advance. Unless you think they are destroying our space craft then there is no chance of contact or progression into space. If that is the case we may have to battle it out one day to escape the planet.
I don't understand how a mining operation is going to make someone filthy rich...Are important minerals going to be cheap to bring back to home? There is a market for this? Who will buy mined asteroid minerals to add up for someone to become a trillionaire?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: StratosFear
I get the feeling we got our hands "slapped" or something before we really got going with our space program.
Would you find it difficult to believe that there is possibly a secret space program which has a higher funding than what the public see?
Oh, I know there is.
The NRO gave NASA some "old" spy satellites that were basically huge space-based telescopes:
The United States' spy satellite agency is giving NASA two spare space telescopes free of charge, each potentially more powerful than the Hubble Space Telescope, NASA officials announced today (June 4).
The two spy satellite telescopes were originally built to fly space-based surveillance missions for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), but will be repurposed by NASA for astronomical research instead. Their donation to NASA was revealed in a surprise announcement.
Both NRO space telescopes have a main mirror nearly 8 feet wide (2.4 meters), rivaling the Hubble Space Telescope, and also carry a secondary mirror to enhance image sharpness, according to press reports. NASA's Hubble telescope is a space icon that has been beaming stunning photos to Earth for 22 years.
space.com
Gee, I wonder what they're using now?
originally posted by: pauljs75
a reply to: game over man
It's by cutting out much of the need for heavy lift. Easier to build something big in space if you don't have to move it piece by piece from the surface. Bringing stuff in and transitioning from a solar orbit to an Earth orbit is easier.
originally posted by: trifecta
The inconvenient truth is a hard pill for most to swallow. Any person who believes the United States hasn't been running a robust space program to our Celestial neighbor, the Moon, and far beyond, needs their head checked.
When you factor in untold, unaccounted for TRILLIONS of dollars missing from the coffers every decade, the counter-intuitive and irrational staged kabbosh on hikes there (the Moon), the systematic obfuscation of clear and contemporary images of planetary bodies(that make recordings from the '70's look "cutting edge"), and the mere fact that most of our unified technology, here on Earth, is light years ahead of propulsion and energy, circumstantially.
I mean seriously, up until just recently you've been force-fed B&W images of the Moon, for nearly 60 years. It took other countries and clever, amateur astronomers with jury-rigged telescopes to reign in on the sheet they've been shoveling, while liberally spending YOUR hard earned tax dollars. NASA sits in their Ivory Tower, gasping for air, while they roll on the floor hysterically, mocking your every wide-eyed sigh, as they dribble on you from above.
I've brought up the idea of launching garbage at the sun with friends before and all I got back was "too expensive". Maybe it is and maybe it is time some of these billionaires start coughing up some funds in the general interest of humanity..
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: TrappedPrincess
I've brought up the idea of launching garbage at the sun with friends before and all I got back was "too expensive". Maybe it is and maybe it is time some of these billionaires start coughing up some funds in the general interest of humanity..
Lets see here.
Using the Falcon 9, the city of Chicago would have to 10 launches per hour 24/7.
How would that affect the ecology?
Childish thoughts without even checking the most basic numbers.
The same goes for mining in space.
Check the price of the final product down here.
Then guess how much it would cost to launch the equipment to produce the exact same product.
Platinum...Gold....Silver...Diamonds...
The ecological impact of mining those on Earth is well known and the "low hanging fruit" have already been picked in most areas considered rich with those precious items.
originally posted by: netbound
For as long as I can remember, I’ve had this feeling that the 1st trillionaire would probably come about as a result of some astroid mining venture. Can’t remember, but I must have read that somewhere years ago, and it made sense to me then, so I’ve held to that belief ever since. I figured it would be accomplished through some commercial space capitalist venture, and not NASA. But, who knows? The next 10 years sounds possible (not surprising) to me, but then I’m just Joe Blow, so how would I know? At any rate, whether we like it or not, I think it’s inevitable. After all, money talks, and if there’s money to be made, then we will do it.
I wish we could avoid it, but I think mining the moon will also happen. I don’t think we need to rape the moon the way we have this planet in order to satisfy our energy requirements. There are other avenues to explore first. Bases for other things, great. Mining for energy, no. But, humans being humans, I doubt we’ll be able to resist the tempation to trash another world. It’s just part of our OCD DNA, it seems.
Then next, eventually, we can go to Mars and trash the hell out of it, too. Whoopee!!
I’ve always been a fan of the Space Program, and have always felt NASA was grossly underfunded. We’ve obviously chosen to sink trillions into fighting groundless, unjustified wars over exploring the universe that gave us life. But let’s face it, developing a viable space program will one day be our only means of escaping a planet we’ve rendered incapable of sustaining life. There are also a lot of technological spinoffs from the program that came about as a result of the research done by NASA and the educational institutions involved in the program. Things most folks take for granted. For anyone interested, here’s a list of just a few.
Since changing human nature isn’t likely, I guess we take the bad with the good. I really do wish we could adjust our priorities, though, and once again experience the magic the whole world felt during the Space Race to the moon (even though it was just a well-disguised political venture). We could do so many good things if we just had the will.
Nice thread, lostbook...