It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: greencmp
And you completely missed the point of the analogy. Insert "reckless by speed" if it suits you better.
Or you ignored the point entirely.
Either way, the explanation stands and there is nothing nefarious behind the term "good tickets."
But don't let that stop you
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: greencmp
And you completely missed the point of the analogy. Insert "reckless by speed" if it suits you better.
Or you ignored the point entirely.
Either way, the explanation stands and there is nothing nefarious behind the term "good tickets."
But don't let that stop you
originally posted by: greencmp
The problem with the litigative solution is that we fund the monster so any financial penalties are ultimately suffered by the taxpayers. It is in fact the very same argument against corporations which, in many cases, cities actually are.
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
a reply to: jtma508
No. They went to prison for racketeering, that's a felony.
Most of the teachers took a plea agreement and got probation. 11 of them thought they would try their luck in court and lost. The judge even warned them about the risk.
The cops are being told to enforce the law, not break the law.
originally posted by: greencmp
But, it does not help everyone else and it does not address the problem.
We want law enforcement to prosecute criminals, not manage non-criminal behavior (nor systematize the illicit profit from) at the point of a spear.
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: boohoo
Florida town infamous for speed traps disbanding police force
"Koona t'chuta Solo?"
-Greedo
originally posted by: greencmp
I just have this one correction that we should be focusing on the problem rather than the symptom.
originally posted by: boohoo
originally posted by: greencmp
I just have this one correction that we should be focusing on the problem rather than the symptom.
For example, citizens will never be able to disband the LAPD or the NYPD, so instead, if funding is significantly reduced to these organizations AND at the same time the courts system gets overloaded, government will be FORCED to change how they do business. That can happen a whole lot quicker than disbanding because the police unions will certainly drag a disbanding order all the way to the supreme court.
On a side note, there is also the PD versus Sheriff issue. De-funding PD's is a just first step because constitutionally a neighboring Sheriff will most likely take over the lost PD duties, but the side effect is that the absence of a PD will also be diluting the influence of the Sheriff's as well, that will be covering more areas than usual.