It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Firefly_
a reply to: ksarge1
The only reason this law is being passed is so the elite can protect themselves. They have been caught too many times snooping illegally, so their solution is to make it legal. Also, they get up to so many vile and disgusting things, they can snoop on potential whistle-blowers and silence them before they spill the beans. I also would not be surprised if corporations have access to the data for marketing purposes too.
This has little to do with protecting us from "terrorists" or pedophiles, which is the angle the BBC were spinning this in. If it were, then the government would need to snoop on themselves because they are full of both groups.
I cant wait for this corrupt, vile government to burn. Its long overdue.
originally posted by: Firefly_
a reply to: uncommitted
Why would you make a distinction between the parties? Same agenda, same bull#, different faces. It makes no difference what party is in power. They are all corrupt, self-serving psychopaths and the majority of laws are made to protect them and their sponsors. This is no exception.
originally posted by: Jukiodone
If only you could write to your MP and expect anything to happen..instead he's too busy loosing files/ taking bribes/faking expenses/covering up for colleagues who are criminals themselves.
I think it is fair to say that if less than 1% of the population is involved in terrorism yet all need to be monitored; we have a very serious case for the tagging of all politicians and the installation of 24/7 video and audio monitoring on all institutions that accept taxpayer funding...how can that not be on the table if the monitoring of innocent citizens is??
originally posted by: earthblaze
I find it disturbing that the government knew about this in April. It is now being railroaded through parliament without debate or scrutiny. This is not democracy.
originally posted by: robbo961
originally posted by: Jukiodone
If only you could write to your MP and expect anything to happen..instead he's too busy loosing files/ taking bribes/faking expenses/covering up for colleagues who are criminals themselves.
I think it is fair to say that if less than 1% of the population is involved in terrorism yet all need to be monitored; we have a very serious case for the tagging of all politicians and the installation of 24/7 video and audio monitoring on all institutions that accept taxpayer funding...how can that not be on the table if the monitoring of innocent citizens is??
With a bit of luck, the same people who are setting this up may get caught in their own trap. They can't use the excuse that emails have gone missing anymore. The data is retained. Sooner or later these corrupt officials will slip up and then we can shove the evidence of their activities in their faces
originally posted by: ksarge1
a reply to: uncommitted
So by monitoring and applying the law, the UK government are not going to be collecting metadata? I think that if you believe that you are very, very naïve. No points are valid? OK, its not on par is it? The UK doesn't bow to their USA maters? OK. I'll agree to disagree. The NSA and GCHQ don't work together? OK. I didn't used to work in those circles? OK. Take a look at the actual law and you will see that additional caveats (since the emergency amendment) have been added from the original law its readily available online in many popular search engines, don't be afraid just open you eyes and mind, you will see soon enough.