It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mohammed Yusef's Invicta Capital put up most of
the estimated 200 million dollars it cost to make the film
version of Dan Brown's novel
The Da Vinci Code movie qualified for an outgoing regime
of tax breaks because it was partially shot in the United Kingdom.
The British government is phasing out the tax incentives because
of allegations of abuse.
The British government thus is helping Mohammed to conduct a jihad
against Christians by promoting the Bible bashing, anti-Christian
propaganda in The Da Vinci Code.
Baehr told reporters at a Washington news conference, "I think
it's a very serious problem when people start funding movies and books
to attack somebody else's religious faith."
He said the financial backing for "The Da Vinci Code" reveals "a terrible
double standard" by Muslims who erupt in violent protests when they
believe their own faith is being attacked.
Leaseback maven and Invicta Capital founder Mohamed Yusef
is mostly responsible for the company's access and expertise. A former
director of leaseback financing at U.K. financing firm Matrix for the past
five years, Yusef decided to set out on his own earlier this year, taking
with him the bulk of his Matrix team and investor pool
Originally posted by imbalanced
There should be a movie debunking the whole muslim religon, why is jesus always in question and not all the other religions in the world ?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
... or did he back it because he's
anti-Christian and wants to destroy Christianity?
Originally posted by dAlen
Its just a movie... who cares?
Big Muslim Money behind DaVinci Movie
According to this report it is a British Muslim who mostly
financially backed the DaVinci movie. hmmmm. Wonder
if we will see any of the 2 billion Christians around the
world riot and call for death to him and/or other muslims
since DaVinci is disrespectful to Christianity and is
considered blasphemous.
So .. did he back this movie because it was a potential
good moneymaker, or did he back it because he's
anti-Christian and wants to destroy Christianity?
Originally posted by imbalanced
There should be a movie debunking the whole muslim religon, why is jesus always in question and not all the other religions in the world ?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
And those complaining about this do have a valid point. The danish cartoons
depicted Muhammed as a terrorist murderer and it slammed Islam. This
movie does the same thing. The church with murderers (considering
PJPI's murder - that's probably true) and it blows apart christianity.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Would he have made the movie if it blew apart Islam? Nope.
And those complaining about this do have a valid point.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Would he have made the movie if it blew apart Islam?
Originally posted by Prove_it
Dan Brown is my hero.....
so much drama about an OK book.
I thought Angels and Demons was much better.
no one cried about that book.
Originally posted by saint4God
To say Christ was "more human than human" (Rob Zombie) is a fundamental defiance of what is what is written,
Outside Source, KJV, Public Domain
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
(1 Timothy 2:5)
But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God;
(Hebrews 10:12)
For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
(1 Corinthians 15:21)
Originally posted by saint4God
what Christ said, what God said,
Originally posted by saint4God
and what many have witnessed.
Outside Source, KJV, Public Domain
Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
(Acts 2:22)
And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.
(Acts 17:30-31)
Originally posted by saint4God
There is no better way to destroy someone who believes or sway someone who is unsure than by persuading them that he was just a man (and not the son of God, God the son).
I would be surprised if anyone said that the movie had Christian financial backers, because they should know better and I hope to God they see why this is a problem.
Outside Source
"Again: This is supposed to be entertainment, it's not theology," he said.
Originally posted by saint4God
To the authors of such "works" *cough cough* write whatever fiction you want, don't expect me to buy it or care.