It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

On Monday March 11, 2013, Congress is reportedly beginning impeachment proceedings against Barack Ob

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2013 @ 11:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


We might be surprised how fast both parties throw this bastard out with the bath water. The country has never been this divided, and the problems of the leftist destroying our economy are just about due to implode.

Better getting rid of the criminal administration,, than seeing an american revolution about right now.



posted on Feb, 6 2013 @ 11:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Spookycolt
Well the republicans may want to check their own legislation, particularly the War Powers Resolution.
50 USC § 1541 - Purpose and policy


(c) Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation



50 USC § 1541 Pub. L. 93–148, § 2,Nov. 7, 1973

93rd United States Congress

House of Representatives
241 Democrat
192 Republican

Senate
56 Democrat
42 Republican

Try again.



posted on Feb, 6 2013 @ 11:34 PM
link   
You realize two of your links state it is happening in 2012 right?


On Monday March 12, 2012,




On Monday March 12, 2012, Congress is reportedly beginning impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama


Ya so probably not.



posted on Feb, 7 2013 @ 11:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Spookycolt



The Republicans want to know how President Obama was able to use military force in Libya last year.


Well the republicans may want to check their own legislation, particularly the War Powers Resolution.

50 USC § 1541 - Purpose and policy




(c) Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation



The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to

(1) a declaration of war,

(2) specific statutory authorization, or

(3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.


www.law.cornell.edu...

Now number 3 is the most important because the President could twist it around to say it qualified under this section. There's no set definition of this particular clause in any great detail.



the "the war powers resolution" was voted into law by a veto proof margin, by a democrat majority in both houses.

you might want to check your own parties legislation.
matter of fact maybe you should go back and check the history of the democrat party, and their tyrannical legislative history.
maybe start in "1913"

The Sixty-third United States Congress was a meeting of the legislative branch of the United States federal government, composed of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. It met in Washington, D.C. from March 4, 1913 to March 4, 1915, during the first two years of Woodrow Wilson's presidency. The apportionment of seats in the House of Representatives was based on the Thirteenth Census of the United States in 1910. Both chambers had a Democratic majority.



October 3, 1913: Revenue Act of 1913 (Federal Income Tax), including Underwood Tariff


December 23, 1913: Federal Reserve Act, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251, 12 U.S.C. § 221, et seq.


November 16, 1914: Federal Reserve Bank opened



do democrats ever read anything, or just blame all of their shortcomings on the other guy.


edit on 7-2-2013 by bjax9er because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 17 2013 @ 09:13 AM
link   
One could only hope that before this president sends this country
into a bloody pointless war on honest constitution upholding citizens..
that congress can actually follow through and do something right for a "change"




top topics
 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join