It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Heartisblack
Not very safe in case of Earthquakes, the bunkers are a distraction. The elites are escaping the planet, and leaving us on it.
Originally posted by Heartisblack
Not very safe in case of Earthquakes, the bunkers are a distraction. The elites are escaping the planet, and leaving us on it.
Originally posted by caladonea
Originally posted by Heartisblack
Not very safe in case of Earthquakes, the bunkers are a distraction. The elites are escaping the planet, and leaving us on it.
What you have stated above...I have been thinking for a while.....I think there is another city...elsewhere...on another planet....already built...where they can go.
Originally posted by AQ6666
Ok, you or your government spend thousands of dollars or euros to build the strongest underground bunker/shelter possible.
You or they find the "best" place in the mountains, escavate deep underground in solid rock, use the best materials and make it energy and food self-suficient for a couple years.
Originally posted by Heartisblack
The elites are escaping the planet, and leaving us on it.
Originally posted by Essan
Originally posted by Heartisblack
The elites are escaping the planet, and leaving us on it.
No we're not.
This is the only planet we have. But if we need to eliminate you lot to ensure its survival, so be it
(never known a species so determined to commit suicide!)
Originally posted by Heartisblack
Originally posted by Essan
Originally posted by Heartisblack
The elites are escaping the planet, and leaving us on it.
No we're not.
This is the only planet we have. But if we need to eliminate you lot to ensure its survival, so be it
(never known a species so determined to commit suicide!)
Think about it, they have everybody focused on the bunkers. You can't tell me with unlimited funds that you can't have space shuttles or some way out. It's just common sense.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
but lets say there is a total global nuclear event that destroys the top for 20 thousand years and you literally must become mole people...two extremely different methods of building a sustainable subterranian civilization. a extended (20k years) stay would do best creating smaller antichambers and just keep digging bubbles and connections, like a martian colony on earth...less people per bubble, and the ability to collapse tunnels should any segment have disaster (plague, tap into a magma chamber, etc)
Originally posted by SaturnFX
And frankly, the only ones that would have trouble adapting to the change from surface dwellers to dwarves would be the first generation. Anyone born in the cave world would simply see it as the norm...hell, they would probably be scared of going outside in the open air with no protection overhead...so yeah, the first generation would be the ones with psychological issues.
Originally posted by ShadowAngel85
I don't see a point in worrying about a War that destroys earth for so long.
Nobody lives that long and the people in the bunker die and i doubt they're in the mood to produce children stuck miles down in the earth while the planet is completely destroyed.
It would be pretty disgusting to create children in such an environment and we aren't as stupid as animals and just jump on each other because our instincts say so.
So it's only important to plan for a maximum of say 100 years. Everything after that just isn't important.
Sounds like you spent too much time playing Fallout
And i don't think the Fallout Fantasy is possible. Living underneath in some huge facilities with hundreds or thousands of people? Yeah, that sounds about fun, especially if you hate 50 guys and still have to live near them.
Bunkers, especially huge bunkers would be pure anarchy and chaos