Sterilization In Australia and the UK: Is this a new part of the agenda?, page 1

Dear mods: Not sure if it is in the right catagory, please move if not.
Note: this is a veeery long article, please stick tight

If you have been watching the news lately, there have been quite a few things about governments bringing up sterilization. In the UK, They are paying drug addicts to be sterilized and in Australia they are thinking of sterlizing people that have abused their children.

An American Charity is offering money to drug and alcohol addicts in the United Kingdom in order to encourage them to go in for surgical sterilization so that unborn babies are not damaged by the drugs during pregnancy.

Norman Geschke, who wrote several scathing reports on child-protection services between 1980 and 1994, said constant state care failings in Victoria compelled him to push the idea of baby bans.

Now before you come and have a fit that child abusers and drug addicts CANNOT have children and should be sterilized i completely AGREE with you, there have been too many stories of children being born addicted to heroin and being sold into prostitution and children dying because of serious cases of neglect.
I am not against these people being sterilized, I am against what this could escalate into. There intent is not what we think it is.

If you have not heard of the NWO depopulation agenda read on, otherwise skip ahead:
Depopulation agenda

"If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels" -Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh
World population is, by all intents and purposes, completely out of control.

Plans are underway now, implemented by the New World Order Elite, to depopulate the planet's 6-7 billion people to a manageable level of between 500 million and 2 billion.

Overall, what the depopulation agenda is is the elites way of saying you dramatically outnumber us and you are too hard to control, so they poison our foods and cause wars. With less people we are easier to control and manipulate.

This, suprisingly enough has NOT been the first time people have been intentionally sterilized. Vaccines have been laced in many third world countries, and even america too.

Source

A covert-sterilisation programme using vaccines such as tetanus, rubella and what looks to be Gardasil (1), also the use of mercury in third world country vaccines (even after they have removed most of it it from Western countries) is suspected of being a birth control ploy (1). They have form with 60,000 Americans coercively sterilized , and between 1963 and 1965 more than 400,000 Colombian women were sterilized in a program funded by the Rockefeller Foundation which also helped found and fund the German eugenics program; and even funded the program that ultimately sent Josef Mengele into Auschwitz (1, 2, 3).]

This is a list I found of ways of sterilization that the government are going to start to put onto the people. This is actually in a book, I just found quotes on the net.

Ecoscience discusses a number of ways in which the global population could be reduced to combat what the authors see as mankind’s greatest threat – overpopulation. In each case, the proposals are couched in sober academic rhetoric, but the horrifying foundation of what Holdren and his co-authors are advocating is clear. These proposals include;
- Forcibly and unknowingly sterilizing the entire population by adding infertility drugs to the nation’s water and food supply.

- Legalizing “compulsory abortions,” ie forced abortions carried out against the will of the pregnant women, as is common place in Communist China where women who have already had one child and refuse to abort the second are kidnapped off the street by the authorities before a procedure is carried out to forcibly abort the baby.
- Babies who are born out of wedlock or to teenage mothers to be forcibly taken away from their mother by the government and put up for adoption. Another proposed measure would force single mothers to demonstrate to the government that they can care for the child, effectively introducing licensing to have children.

- Implementing a system of “involuntary birth control,” where both men and women would be mandated to have an infertility device implanted into their body at puberty and only have it removed temporarily if they received permission from the government to have a baby.

- Permanently sterilizing people who the authorities deem have already had too many children or who have contributed to “general social deterioration”.
- Formally passing a law that criminalizes having more than two children, similar to the one child policy in Communist China.

- This would all be overseen by a transnational and centralized “planetary regime” that would utilize a “global police force” to enforce the measures outlined above. The “planetary regime” would also have the power to determine population levels for every country in the world.

The ones that are in italics are already in practice. Our food and water has been tarnished with many things, there have been cases where GMO corn has caused infertility, corn is also a massive staple food which also makes it that bit more suspicious. (thanks monsato!)

Designer corn to promote male infertility. That would account for the rise in erectile dysfunction medications. The information is right here people. In this article the gene is known which leads to infertility. How convenient for Monsanto. Targeting male fertility would certainly affect the population.

There was also a case in china where people taking baby formulas had deformed children. Little girls were developing breasts and pubic hair at 4 years of age.

Chinese dairy products were recalled worldwide in 2008 after it was revealed that melamine, which is used to make plastics, had been found in the products of 22 companies, illegally added to give the appearance of a higher protein content. The adulteration was blamed for killing at least six infants and for sickening 300,000 in China.

This is also quite interesting. Someone claims that HIV is part of this depopulation too, not too sure about it though but I will include it anyway. HIV and the depopulation agenda.

Now, the difference between the list above and the Australia/UK sterilization is that is appears that they have changed there method. In the list above, all of them would cause massive public outcry (some already have) and cause people to gain attention of these issues and challenge them as many ATS users do. Now, they are attempting to sterilize people in ways that the public would deem acceptable as to condition us to it. I doubt there will be much public outcry as it is the opinion of the majority of people that child abusers/drug addicts should not have children thus the public deeming it acceptable. The problem with this however is that it opens the doorway to public sterilization. Once people are conditioned to the fact that the government can openly sterilize whomever they wish new practices of sterilization will be brought up and people will be more likely to accept them because it is the 'norm'. For example, 70 years ago nudity was a MASSIVE deal and showing ankles was concidered pornography, then playboy magazine came in and opened the door to nudity and the like and conditioned the viewing public to it. Now it is acceptable to have shorts that only just have enough fabric to make a BELT. Go figure.

It may one day other crimes would be punishable by sterilization that have nothing to do with the raising of a child (evading taxes ect) AND maybe one day they will dig deeply into our pre adult rap sheets and if you were convited of taking drugs in the past they may deem you for sterilization even though you may have been simply experementing and have not touched whatever substance for 20 so years. There is also the case that people DO hit rough spots in their lives and give into drugs, this does not mean that they cannot redeem themselves and come of them so what if they have already become sterilized before that? There is also the case with child abusers, yes some people do severly hurt there children which i am completely against but the child protection system (In Australia) is FAR from perfect and this could easily be manipulated. A child could get the wooden spoon and if that gets reported to DOCS you may get a knock on the door depending on what context the teacher that reported it used. This is how bad DOCS is at differenciating against cases.
Overall, it really seems that now they have changed there methods of sterilization to appeal more with the public eye. This is NOT the first time we have INTENTIONALLY been sterilized and I feel that there intentions are not what we deem/want them to be.

Sources:
Sterilization in the UK
Sterilization List
List part 2
Euro Union and GMO foods
GMO gene leads to infertility
Baby formula
Sterilizing Aus

Please state your opinions

edit on 22-10-2010 by littlecloud because: (no reason given)