It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by halfoldman
EVERYBODY should know their HIV status, doesn't matter who or what you are.
To spread this disease, without knowing your status, is wrong. And if you do spread it knowing your status, that is a serious wrong doing.
VVV
Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by badw0lf
LOL, touche badwolf.
I thought this might happen. I do apologize.
VVV
Originally posted by halfoldman
However, many evengelical Christians tell me that the husband is the head of the household.
He has the right to know these things, and make mistakes, and the woman must be the faithful 'heart" of the home, while he is the God-ordained "head" of the home.
.
Originally posted by halfoldman
reply to post by Jovi1
Interestingly, during the pomp surrounding the Pope's visit to Britain, that question which affects millions was totally overshadowed by the child-sex scandals.
I only saw it answered vaguely once, with some vague reference that they couldn't stop anyone from using a condom.
I see some evangelicals now also using that argument.
It sounds ridiculous to me.
In other words, throw the doctrinal problem back at the believer, and make basic public health a matter of conscience!
I'd say they are personally responsible for every wife that is infected, or HIV-positve child thus born, and it is high time they were dragged to court and sued for billions! But how does one ever sue a faith....
edit on 30-9-2010 by halfoldman because: (no reason given)
It is simple if your married you have sex with your spouse and only your spouse that is all there is to say about it. Anything else is justifying bad behavior.