It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IAMNOTWHOITSAYSIAM
Originally posted by cmarieseesThe vaccines risks far outway the risks of the illnesses that they claim to prevent...
The reason vaccinations are required in the states is for herd immunization. Not all people develop an immunity after being vaccinated, but if everyone else is vaccinated their chances of getting the disease are next to none and if there is an outbreak of disease its unlikely to spread. However, if you have a good number of people who avoided vaccinations all together, then the herd immunization is worthless. Those who weren't vaccinated will get sick, some who are immune but have weak immune systems will get sick, and the disease will spread through the population rapidly.
Originally posted by RogerT
Originally posted by IAMNOTWHOITSAYSIAM
Originally posted by cmarieseesThe vaccines risks far outway the risks of the illnesses that they claim to prevent...
The reason vaccinations are required in the states is for herd immunization. Not all people develop an immunity after being vaccinated, but if everyone else is vaccinated their chances of getting the disease are next to none and if there is an outbreak of disease its unlikely to spread. However, if you have a good number of people who avoided vaccinations all together, then the herd immunization is worthless. Those who weren't vaccinated will get sick, some who are immune but have weak immune systems will get sick, and the disease will spread through the population rapidly.
That's a very convenient theory with no proof that I've ever seen.
Nice PR though. Those that don't insist on evidence to support it will probably buy it.
The parents of 9 year-old Hannah Poling spoke to the media this week about the US government's landmark decision to pay compensation following their claim that childhood vaccines caused their daughter's autism. The government's sealed decision, made last November, was recently made public on an autism advocacy group website.
The payout, the extent of which is yet to be decided, comes from a federal fund that compensates victims of vaccine-related injuries. The ruling effectively states that Hannah's pre-existing rare mitochondrial disorder had disposed her to autism and this was "significantly aggravated" by the vaccines she received as a toddler eight years ago.
Originally posted by xynephadyn
It is EXACTLY the preservatives in the Vaccine's I am concerned about. When I was a baby, early 80's, vaccination concerns were minimum, although my mother shared with me her concerns that she had then too.
If only we could get Novartis to comply
Originally posted by Aristophrenia
The MMR studies were all proven to absolute crock. There is a 3% chance or less of anything going wrong with all vaccinations - and 100% of your child getting something seriously wrong with them if you do not.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
my state is a force vac state and you can't put a child in daycare or school without them.
So if your in a forced vac state, you may not have a choice. but more pediatricians are accepting delayed vaccinations. You may go that route, unless you have to put your child in daycare.
Originally posted by RogerT
reply to post by IAMNOTWHOITSAYSIAM
the onus is on YOU to prove that the injections are:
1. Effective
2. Safe
3. Necessary
As you will not be able to prove all, if any of the above, then you can keep your needles and your fear to yourself and those that share your views. Thanks so much.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
In the case of polio, you will see in this source that in 1952, there were 21,000 cases. The vaccine was introduced in 1955. In 1960, there were 2525 cases (an 88% drop), and in 1965 there were 61 cases (a 99.8% drop from 1952 and a 98& drop from 1960). Since 1979, there have been ZERO naturally occurring cases of polio in the United States.