posted on Mar, 17 2010 @ 12:55 PM
What would happen if?
You fill out the form completely. Then take a black magic marker and edit out everything but how many people live in the house? Somewhat like they do
when you ask them for something using the FOI act? Most things they send are blacked out. Why not do the same to them? You did fill out the form so
you complied right?
I found this anyone know if it is accurate or not?
Copy and paste the following letter below into a word document and insert your address only at the bottom and print it out and send it with your
census... Show "big brother" they are violating our privacy by asking for names and personal information of each member of your household.
To Whom it May Concern,
Pursuant to Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution, the only information you are empowered to request is the total number of occupants at
this address. My “name, sex, age, date of birth, race, ethnicity, telephone number, relationship and housing tenure” have absolutely nothing to do
with apportioning direct taxes or determining the number of representatives in the House of Representatives. Therefore, neither Congress nor the
Census Bureau have the constitutional authority to make that information request a component of the enumeration outlined in Article I, Section 2,
Clause 3. In addition, I cannot be subject to a fine for basing my conduct on the Constitution because that document trumps laws passed by
Congress.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447, 479 (May 26, 1894)
“Neither branch of the legislative department [House of Representatives or Senate], still less any merely administrative body [such as the Census
Bureau], established by congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen.
Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168, 190. We said in Boyd v. U.S., 116 U. S. 616, 630, 6 Sup. Ct. 524,―and it cannot be too often repeated,―that
the principles that embody the essence of constitutional liberty and security forbid all invasions on the part of government and it’s employees of
the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of his life.
As said by Mr. Justice Field in Re Pacific Ry. Commission, 32 Fed. 241, 250, ‘of all the rights of the citizen, few are of greater importance or
more essential to his peace and happiness than the right of personal security, and that involves, not merely protection of his person from assault,
but exemption of his private affairs, books, and papers from inspection and scrutiny of others. Without the enjoyment of this right, all others would
lose half their value.’”
Note: This United States Supreme Court case has never been overturned.
Any further questions or attempts to correspond with myself or those that reside in our home, I demand that each person be read their Miranda
Rights.
Respectfully,
Residents of (INSERT YOUR ADDRESS HERE)
[edit on 17-3-2010 by Dragonsbreaths]