posted on Feb, 19 2008 @ 01:58 AM
A pill can be made to correct your obsessive behavior.
Of course, such a pill would be proof that there is a conspiracy, right? Wrong.
The conspiracy theorist operates on the recognition that many things do not clearly link together on a causal chain (such as the fall of Rome, or
ADHD), coupled with the belief they actually should, and the desire to find a link and rationalize it into the chain. For most, a paranoid feeling of
persecution or victimization is also evident.
Normal people don't go chasing that belief and trying to fill in the gaps just for the sake of it. When one attempts to complete a puzzle, one does
not generally use a rock, a piece of paper, or jelly to fill in the last piece - just for the sake of finishing the puzzle.
The problem with conspiracy theories is that while filling in many pieces of the puzzle, people use rocks, paper, and jelly to fill in the gaps -
which is why there are so many versions of each particular conspiracy, just as there would be different versions of the puzzle. A puzzle is what the
all encompassing NWO conspiracy is, after all.
There are not many conspiracy theories about the fall of Rome, because it is left mostly to rational Historians. Try linking a chain of events
together that results in the fall of Rome, and you'll have many options to choose from - people will agree and disagree, some will say Rome never
fell, but merely changed with the times. Most conspiracy theorists will not acquire enough knowledge about Rome throughout its course, and so
conspiracy is not widely speculated.
Now, if we look at ADHD, there actually are conspiracy theories about it. Why is that? First off, there is not as much information needed to
rationalize a conspiracy theory. Starting with the basis of capitalism, BigPharm making profits - rather, greed - one can rationalize per greedy
agenda that because there is not yet enough evidence to show that ADHD is caused by genetics or by environment there must be "something deeper," and
come to the irrational conclusion that the disease is a scheme by doctors and greedy BigPharm to steal your money - they are greedy, after all. When
the question is raised, "How are so many doctors in on it," doctors can be rationalized away by saying that they aren't actually aware of it - they
were lied to in medical school. Of course, asking the same question about BigPharm would never lead the devout theorist to say, "Perhaps BigPharm
isn't aware of it either - perhaps they are not really greedy, perhaps it is just business and the nature of the corporation."
Of course, a normal objective person would say the above, and "Perhaps it is a combination of both genetics and environment that causes the disorder,
but until genetic analysis techniques improve, we can not be sure."
The above reasoning can not be adhered to by the theorist, as it renders the basis of the theory null and would kill it and everything that stems from
it. Greed is essential. Yet, paradoxically, we can continue to rationalize that BigPharm is not greedy, and still concoct a theory suggesting that the
NWO is behind it all and they plant fake evidence everywhere and forward contrived data to BigPharm so that they create medication for conditions that
are not even real. This isn't often done as BigPharm must not be a victim, but rather a victimizer. The role of victim is always reserved for the
common man. What is never done by the theorist is questioning further, "Is the NWO aware that it exists?"
If we ask that precarious question which could potentially destroy the entire theory, we can keep it afloat by rationalizing that Reptilians are in on
it. Most people don't go this far, as evident by the reaction to reptilian threads. In essence, those who have gone this far have delved into the
destruction of the NWO theory, only to manifest the most extreme reasons for the theory to exist.
The BigPharm theory usually fits quite well into the NWO blueprint, does it not? When the context of the NWO is added, BigPharm is not only greedy,
but they wish to medicate the population into subservient zombies, and so become tools of the NWO - giving them yet another property that can be
worked and investigated by the theorist - as a tool, it can be rationalized that they are not aware of it as described above.
If we add aliens to the theory, we can rationalize them in quite well also. Reptilians are behind it all, and the population is being turned into
subservient zombies as food for the aliens. The NWO is either working with them, are them, or are not aware that they are pulling the strings.
Reptilians become merely another level of Elite - a common concept in conspiracy theory - the "shadow government" of the elite.
... and when we ask you if you'd like to take a pill to suppress the obsession of trying to find conceptually discrete causal links in a correlative
world... well, that is the most easily rationalized factor - control.