Russia is the first country in the world to smell of violets

Hello ATS!

The "green agenda" that environmentalists and the Biden administration are now imposing in the world is actually a "tax out of nothing", a "tax out of thin air." This is actually another way of robbing countries outside the Anglo-Saxon world. And if before they gave glass beads in exchange for gold, now they do not want to give these beads either. The idea is to first move the most harmful industries to third countries, and then, with the help of a "carbon tax", completely rob these countries.

Russia was also involved in this process, hoping to receive from it tens of billions of dollars annually out of nothing. Until recently, it was almost officially considered in the West that Russia "pollutes" the air with carbon emissions and ranks fourth in the world in terms of "carbon pollution" of the atmosphere, after the United States, China, and India.
Almost officially, the following table "walked" in the Western media:



With a quota per ton of CO2 emissions, which now costs 50 euros in Europe, anyone who wants to can calculate how many tens of billions of euros Russia had to pay annually.

When Putin agreed with Biden and the European greens, many in Russia were at a loss. Why did you agree to pay so quickly and easily? But we underestimated Putin again. Vladimir has a black belt in judo, and this fight involves the use of the opponent's strength against himself. To fall using the strength of your opponent, to give the movement an additional impetus, and then to be on top yourself - this is the principle of judo.

So, Putin instructed Roslesinforg, an all-Russian organization specializing in the comprehensive solution of forest accounting and forest management tasks in the interests of the state, to conduct a scientific study that takes into account all forest and bog resources of Russia and their ability to absorb CO2. And then there was a sensation, Western calculations turned out to be unscientific. In reality, even despite the annual natural fires, the forest area in Russia is increasing, and thanks to warming, many areas of permafrost are turning into swamps.

As a result of scientific research, it has been proved that when CO2 emissions from industry fall by 0.13 billion tons, the forests of the Russian Federation absorb up to 1.6 billion tons of CO2 per year.

"The carbon stock in biomass is estimated in three pools: aboveground and underground phytomass and woody detritus (dead wood, dead wood, stumps and brushwood). The total carbon stock in aboveground and underground phytomass is 38.59 Gt, the carbon stock in dead wood is dead wood, dead wood. , stumps - 6.21 Gt. In total for the three pools - 44.8 Gt. Average carbon stock in aboveground and underground phytomass - 42.9 t C / ha. Average carbon stock in dead wood (woody detritus) - 6.9 t C / ha. "

That is, Russia turned out to be the first country in the world with surplus green energy, and now it is not Russia that owes money to the European Union, but the European Union owes Russia. And the European Union pays - 47.5 billion euros annually. Russia became the first "green" country in the world with an advanced industry, and it also makes decent money from it.

Here is a judo from Putin,

Thank you.

Putin is no senile idiot IMO so Russia is lucky in that sense. I also read someplace of the latest study about forest releasing more methane than ever thought possible. IMO anyone/country who signs on the the climate change B.S. is in it for personal gains certainly not the history of climate cycles of earth..

Russia is warming that is true, pollution is not only reason to it.

World Pollution map
MAP

What really concerns is permafrost melting in Siberia, it throws a lot of greengas and carbon emission. It is said that when permafrost melts it will also melt North Pole for good. Don´t think this its all against Russia, think about what will happen all over the World when Poles melt..
Of course Russia should do something to pollution as should every other country. 4 countries with most carbon emissions are 1. China. 2.United States 3. India 4. Russian Federation in that order.

Hey, why not use the excess carbon to make carbon nano particles? I hear that they have a million and one uses.

The technology is there to reduce, even eliminate, any carbon footprint, however, it is likely cheaper to pay fines or carbon taxes than to invest in ways to reduce or remove carbon from industrial sources. It becomes an overhead cost of business and merely becomes inflated prices for consumers while they make the carbon someone else's problem to absorb.

Even lawns and ornamental landscapes remove a fair amount of carbon. Natural grasslands like prairies and savannas absorb almost as much carbon as forests, so I imagine that grain crops or even uncultivated fields absorb a lot of carbon too. Stagnant pools of water in swamps, ditches and septic pounds have carbon eating algae blooms. If in depth studies were done in agricultural, urban and suburban environments, it is probable they sequester more carbon in numerous ways than they are given credit for.

parma violets smell yummy.