It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Canada has unveiled its first monument to the US Civil War, honouring the 40,000 Canadians who fought during America's bloodiest conflict.
"No one can fully understand Canada without appreciating that the war was an essential factor in the country's birth," wrote historian John Boyko in his 2013 book Blood and Daring. "We owe it to ourselves to understand the Civil War - to heed its whispering ghosts."
While some maintain the war was fought for "state's rights", most historians agree it was over slavery, which the South sought to preserve.
Although Confederate monuments in the US have been the subject of heated debate, supporters of the Ontario monument, which commemorates those who fought on both sides, say they are only interested in history.
"We don't have any far-right maniacs, racists or anti-Semites, we're just town folks who are interested in history,"
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
I don't see how anyone could have a problem with this monument (beautiful piece of art by the way) or even disagree with their sentiments. At the essence of every statue lies an important time in history - nothing more, nothing less.
Acknowledgement of a new era
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
Link
Canada has unveiled its first monument to the US Civil War, honouring the 40,000 Canadians who fought during America's bloodiest conflict.
"No one can fully understand Canada without appreciating that the war was an essential factor in the country's birth," wrote historian John Boyko in his 2013 book Blood and Daring. "We owe it to ourselves to understand the Civil War - to heed its whispering ghosts."
While some maintain the war was fought for "state's rights", most historians agree it was over slavery, which the South sought to preserve.
Although Confederate monuments in the US have been the subject of heated debate, supporters of the Ontario monument, which commemorates those who fought on both sides, say they are only interested in history.
"We don't have any far-right maniacs, racists or anti-Semites, we're just town folks who are interested in history,"
I don't see how anyone could have a problem with this monument (beautiful piece of art by the way) or even disagree with their sentiments. At the essence of every statue lies an important time in history - nothing more, nothing less. In my opinion, context should never matter or even be allowed to determine one's merit. I would even argue the history you want to forget, is the one you need to remember most.
While I agree that removing a statue isn't completely erasing its history, it is a dangerous precedent that leads down that road, and at the very least it will end up distorting the truth. Why the need to succumb to feelings?
Why is even preserving history the way it was cemented so important? We'll just take a look at the debate on who started the KKK. 2 different sides that are absolutely certain they have the correct version of history.
Those who destroy history, get to rewrite history..