It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Byrd
It doesn't really represent any big issue.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Iamonlyhuman
Wouldn't the conservatives be cheering for it? After all they're the ones who believe that he's a rapist. Why have a statue of a rapist?
You believe he isn't?
Didn't say that.
Are you a conservative?
No. Liberals can believe that he is a rapist too. The conservatives are the ones who scream the loudest about it.
Ok, just wondering.
To answer your question, no I don't believe that he is a rapist. But what do I know? I could be wrong. I despite rapists. If he is a rapist then lock him away and throw away the key. And the statue should be removed and destroyed.
So why beat around the bush?
I wasn't. I was commenting that the conservatives should be happy to have the statue removed and destroyed because he is a rapist as many conservatives here have been screaming.
ETA - to be clear I made that post because of all the thread about the "leftists" wanting statues removed and destroyed.
It took you three posts to answer my initial question.
Yes because I am not the topic of discussion.