It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the immortal words of Rodney King, "Why can't we all jus git alone?"
man was created and evolved just as the good lord intended. What�s so difficult to understand about that statement?
shaunybaby
this thread has kinda evolved a little??? now its talk about people being possessed by the devil etc...what happened to the creationism thread and why people believe in it???
Originally posted by shmick25
Really? And does [psychology]explain objects flying around a room, claw marks magically appearing around a persons neck, the ability to speak in non learned languages?
shmick
So, you are saying, for science to be able to 'scientifically' explain anything it must be in a lab?.
shmick
Of course some scientists will have an answer, because they have an answer for everything.
A guesstimate, even an educated guesstimate, however, is not a legitimate answer when it comes to science as guesstimates involve faith.
The response by the Medical Research Council was that �microwave therapy has no scientific basis for the treatment of cancer�. Tell that to the hundreds and thousands of people that die each year from cancer! I wonder if you were dying from this same disease, would you be looking for �un-scientific� methods of treatment?
shmick
I never argued that this model didn't carry across to religions, and it does.
The topic of this thread is 'why do people believe in Creationism'. I am trying to give you an answer. The origins of life are a mystery. The complex design of earth is too unique and perfect for 'chance' to have created it.
Originally posted by TKainZero
I have never gotten how these people that think that god made the earth in 7 days, or that there was nothing and then poof, there is everything. It is purely insane. Can everyone here give me any fact, sientific or not that this is even possible. Also question to you, people like to try to debunk the big bang by saying that where did the stuff come from if there was nothing there, then i ask you where did your gad come from, the same nothing that you doubt?
[edit on 12/21/2004 by TKainZero]
Originally posted by shaunybaby
i like phantom chatter's point about the extra layer of atmosphere that would have made us live in to out 800s. however, a flood destroyed this and now we only live to about 70...what a bummer. could you imagine if god hadn't have wanted to kill his people and make a flood then we would have been living in to our 800s. i also like the fact that phantom has tried to link the ancient bible and its teaching of a flood to the same world wide event of our hole in the atmosphere.
the only problem with this is that adam and eve lived till about 900, noah was about 900, enoch was about 365, lamech was about 700. from this it is acceptable to say that everyone in those days lived a very long life to that of what we know today. however, no extra layer in the atmosphere is going to make us live till we are 900. i would love to know exactly how it would because the human body is only capable of living to a certain time. this is because the very few that make it to about 120 years old, can barely walk, are blind and possible deaf. the reason why we age like we do is to do with our genes and dna. they are set up to make us age like we do. the only way people could have lived to 900 would be if the genes and dna were set up to slow down the ageing process by about 10 times. the only problem with this again is that no extra layer in our atmosphere would do this. we already have a protective layer that stops our planet from freezing over from the cold of space, gives us air to breathe, and keeps the uv rays away from us. there is no need for an extra layer in our atmosphere.
I've heard it refered to as the 'fine tuning' arguement or the 'anthropic principle'. I think its a bit of a fallacy, which is illustrated by the more extreme version of it where the proponent states that, not only is the universe 'fine tuned' so as to guarantee that life exists, but its so fine tuned, and the evolutionary history was so constrained, that, since if any one of billions of stages had been slightly different there wouldn't be humans, that the universe is predetermined to result in man
Originally posted by shaunybaby
o rite i see, so if a person says they have been or are being possesed by some sort of devil that it makes the creationists theory more credible?
Originally posted by shaunybaby
you read genesis and find one huge contradiction saying animals were made before man and in the very next verse you see that it says man was created before animals.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
i see nothing at all that is devine or spiritual about the bible. show me where the devinity is?
Originally posted by shaunybaby
...is it the threat made at the end about anyone trying to change the bible will be condemed to hell. is it prehaps the so called new testament books that make it look as thought they are eye witness accounts, when really they were mostly written by people that never even met jesus. the founder of christianity was a person called paul, he never met jesus! the founder of christianity never even met the so called messiah. without paul all you have is a cult that jesus and john the baptist tried to promote. what happened to those two?...john the baptist was decapitated, and jesus died of a humilating death. jesus didnt die for our sins, he had no choice...he went against the rules of his land, his original religion and teachings of judaism to pretending to be something he was not.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
however, a god that created us, the earth, the stars and universe, howcome he fell short of just creating our life on earth rather than not making the whole universe full of life.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
mars doesnt have an atmosphere and isn't livable like earth is...so why if there is a god did god not make life on mars aswell like we have on earth?
Originally posted by shaunybaby
a god so poweful that he can make an infinite universe, yet he can only create life on one planet.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
this is a god that loves life itself yet only wants to make one planet with life. i don't get this...someone tell me why?
Demonstrate that this has occured and then maybe there is something to consider.
Not in a lab per say, but at least under controlled conditions.
I thought your entire point was that there was no answer?
Which scientific explanations can you demonstrate are incorrect?
But why should the fact that many people beleive in god require the existence of god?
I recall Dawkin's made mention of another scientist who was dying from cancer. Rather than throw his hands up in fear and run from snake oil sales man to the snake oil sale man he stayed the course and only took treatment that was demonstrated to work. As so many people with cancer do, he died. But he died not having given in to witch doctorism. I find it admirable.
You, however, have left out some important details. For what reasons did the MRC conclude that 'microwave therapy' didn't work? Thats whats important. It doesn't matter that some people went to this guy and didn't die of cancer. Juju bags, by that reasoning, cure cancer. Satanic sacrifices, by that reasoning, can work miracles.
So if all science is worthelss because of disagreement then why aren't you applying this rational to your own religion?
What data demonstrates this? I understand that you, personally, find it too 'incredible', and that this leads you to beleive in a creator.
Originally posted by toneloke
Can you explain a little more clearley why you dissagree with the 'Goldie Locks' (cosmic constant) argument?
Originally posted by shmick25
And how can you demonstrate the big bang theory in a lab or under controlled situations?
What the initial amount of the parent atoms are at the time that the rock formed.
That the decay rate of parent atom to daughter atom has always remained constant.
I find it stupid. A friend of mine had cancer at the age of 21. She was placed on kemo and died shortly after. If I get cancer, I will NOT be subscribing to 'scientific' treatment of cancer when I can see the results with my own eyes.
One would have to question how much power the drug companies have over what gets practiced and prescribed.
If we had 200 diagnosed with cancer and the only treatment they received was drinking iced tea, I would argue that there could be a link between drinking ice tea and remission of cancer.
So if all science is worthelss because of disagreement then why aren't you applying this rational to your own religion?
The odds in favor of the chance formation of a functional simple cell are acknowledged to be worse than 1 in 10 sq40,000 (www.foolishfaith.com...)
Originally posted by shaunybaby
im not saying i know that there isnt life anywhere else in the universe. im saying why if there is a god...why did he not make 10 planets like ours in our solar system...what is there a need for all that other stuff that far away? millions and millions of lightyears away stuff that we can never get to...whats the point in that?? it says that when the stars were made adam saw them right away, which is impossible because the light we see from the stars is what has happened millions of years ago, adam could not have seen those stars straight away. even if god did create light...he cannot make us see it instantly from a million lightyears away, that's impossible in a spiritual sense and a scientific way to.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
im not saying i know that there isnt life anywhere else in the universe. im saying why if there is a god...why did he not make 10 planets like ours in our solar system...what is there a need for all that other stuff that far away? millions and millions of lightyears away stuff that we can never get to...whats the point in that?? it says that when the stars were made adam saw them right away, which is impossible because the light we see from the stars is what has happened millions of years ago, adam could not have seen those stars straight away. even if god did create light...he cannot make us see it instantly from a million lightyears away, that's impossible in a spiritual sense and a scientific way to.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
im not saying i know that there isnt life anywhere else in the universe. im saying why if there is a god...why did he not make 10 planets like ours in our solar system...
Originally posted by shaunybaby
what is there a need for all that other stuff that far away?
Originally posted by shaunybaby
millions and millions of lightyears away stuff that we can never get to...whats the point in that??
Originally posted by shaunybaby
it says that when the stars were made adam saw them right away, which is impossible because the light we see from the stars is what has happened millions of years ago, adam could not have seen those stars straight away.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
even if god did create light...he cannot make us see it instantly from a million lightyears away, that's impossible in a spiritual sense and a scientific way to.