It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Cabin
a reply to: DJW001
NATO, as an organisation, did not show that much initiative to expanding, as the nations themselves showed. At least, I can say for Baltics, do not know about other post-Soviet nations. But Baltics wanted NATO and worked hard for it for years to even be considered as a potential member, while there were many in NATO, who did see them rather as a liabilility due them being so small nations. There is too much negative history with Russia and it had to be secured that history would not repeat itself a strong ally was needed for these nations.
Knowing the attitude toward Russia in this area, I have serious doubts about the number of people in Ukraine being in favour of Russian policies. Round here is also large Russian population, yet when the media even considered that a scenario like that could happen here, vast majority of them felt insulted that something like that was even considered...
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Cabin
Something similar happened in every nation Soviet Union occupied
And that is why NATO expanded so rapidly after the fall of the Soviet Union. Never again. That is why Ukraine is the line in the sand.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Cabin
Something similar happened in every nation Soviet Union occupied
And that is why NATO expanded so rapidly after the fall of the Soviet Union. Never again. That is why Ukraine is the line in the sand.
NATO is only 28 nations and the Ukraine isn't part of it. There is nothing in the Ukraine important enough that will make it a line in the sand. If anything it will just another NATO failure like the war in Afghanistan. NATO is just like the UN and both are useless.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Cabin
Something similar happened in every nation Soviet Union occupied
And that is why NATO expanded so rapidly after the fall of the Soviet Union. Never again. That is why Ukraine is the line in the sand.
NATO is only 28 nations and the Ukraine isn't part of it. There is nothing in the Ukraine important enough that will make it a line in the sand. If anything it will just another NATO failure like the war in Afghanistan. NATO is just like the UN and both are useless.
Or the war in the Balkans? Nothing worth fighting for there, either.
originally posted by: tri-lobe-1
Putin needs to stay....
he is doing a great job....
go get them neo-nazis Vlad...
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Cabin
Something similar happened in every nation Soviet Union occupied
And that is why NATO expanded so rapidly after the fall of the Soviet Union. Never again. That is why Ukraine is the line in the sand.
NATO is only 28 nations and the Ukraine isn't part of it. There is nothing in the Ukraine important enough that will make it a line in the sand. If anything it will just another NATO failure like the war in Afghanistan. NATO is just like the UN and both are useless.
Or the war in the Balkans? Nothing worth fighting for there, either.
So you can't think of anything current to support your position? And no there is nothing in the Balkans or the Ukraine that is worth America going to war over.